Confused about Euler-Lagrange Equations and Partial Differentiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Euler-Lagrange equations in the context of a specific Lagrangian. Participants explore the implications of partial differentiation and the treatment of variables as functions of a parameter, specifically in relation to the coordinates involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a Lagrangian and seeks to derive the Euler-Lagrange equations, questioning which coordinates should be treated as functions of the parameter s.
  • Another participant suggests considering the right-hand side of the z equation in two steps, prompting a focus on the partial derivative with respect to \(\dot{z}\).
  • A participant calculates the partial derivative \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{z}}\) and provides the result, which is \(\frac{2R^2}{z^2}\dot{z}\).
  • There is a follow-up on differentiating this result with respect to s, leading to uncertainty about whether to consider only \(\dot{z}\) or both \(z\) and \(\dot{z}\) as functions of s.
  • One participant notes that if \(z\) were not a function of s, then \(\dot{z}\) would always be zero, highlighting the dependency of the variables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the treatment of variables as functions of s, indicating that there is no consensus on how to proceed with the differentiation in the context of the Euler-Lagrange equations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved questions about which variables should be treated as functions of s, leading to different interpretations of the differentiation process.

wglmb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have a Lagrangian [tex]L = \frac{R^2}{z^2} ( -\dot{t}^2 +\dot{x}^2 +\dot{y}^2 +\dot{z}^2)[/tex] and I want to find the Euler-Lagrange equations [tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial q} = \frac{d}{ds} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}[/tex]
I'm fine with the LHS and the partial differentiation on the RHS, but when it comes to the [tex]\frac{d}{ds}[/tex] I'm not sure which coordinates I'm supposed to consider as a function of s.

Is it all of them (ie t, x, y, z, and their derivatives)
Or is it only the one I'm doing the equation for (so for the z-equation that's just z and its derivative)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the RHS of the z equation in two steps. First step: What is

[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{z}}?[/tex]
 
[tex]\frac{2R^2}{z^2}\dot{z}[/tex]
 
wglmb said:
[tex]\frac{2R^2}{z^2}\dot{z}[/tex]

So

[tex]\frac{d}{ds} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{z}} = \frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{2R^2}{z^2}\dot{z} \right) = ?[/tex]
 
Well this is it - I don't know what should be considered a function of s.

If it's just z-dot then [tex]\frac{2R^2}{z^2}\ddot{z}[/tex]

If it's z-dot & z then [tex]\frac{2R^2}{z^2}\ddot{z} - \frac{4R^2}{z^3}\dot{z}^2[/tex]
 
If [itex]z[/itex] weren't a function of [itex]s[/itex], then [itex]\dot{z}[/itex] would always be zero.
 
oops, haha good point. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K