Euler-Lagrange Equations: EM Field Term

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving Maxwell's equations in free space from the field Lagrangian, specifically addressing the term involving the four-vector potential A. The Euler-Lagrange equation is applied to derive the necessary derivatives, particularly the term involving the product rule of calculus for the derivatives of the four-vector potential. The challenge lies in managing the indices correctly, utilizing the identity involving the Kronecker delta for derivatives of the four-vector potential. The solution involves lowering indices using the metric tensor, leading to a definitive expression for the derivative of the potential terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of four-vector potentials in electromagnetism
  • Proficiency in tensor calculus and index notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Maxwell's equations from the Lagrangian formalism
  • Learn about the application of the product rule in tensor calculus
  • Explore the use of Kronecker delta in tensor derivatives
  • Investigate the role of metric tensors in lowering and raising indices
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying electromagnetism and field theory, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of Maxwell's equations.

Gene Naden
Messages
320
Reaction score
64
This problem is about one small step in the derivation of Maxwell's equations in free space from the field Lagrangian. The Lagrangian contains a term proportional to

##\partial \mu A_\nu \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial \nu A\mu \partial ^\mu A^\nu## where A is the four-vector potential.

The Euler-Lagrange equation requires a derivative ##\partial \mu ( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial \mu A \nu )})##

The problem is to get a term ##\partial \mu ( \partial ^\mu A^\nu - \partial ^\nu A ^\mu)##

I want to apply the product rule of calculus to compute ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\alpha A_\beta \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}## and ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\beta A_\alpha \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}##

This should bring in a factor of two.

But I am having difficulty managing the indices. The stack exchange says I can use the identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial_\alpha A _\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}## in terms of the Kronecker ##\delta## but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gene Naden said:
but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##

Lower the indices in the numerator by extracting a metric from it, i.e., ##\partial^\alpha A^\beta = \eta^{\alpha\gamma}\eta^{\beta\delta} \partial_\gamma A_\delta##. The metric components are constant and can be taken out of the derivative. You can then apply your previous relation with deltas, essentially leaving you with the metric tensors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Gene Naden
Thanks, I get ##\frac{\partial \left( \partial ^\alpha A^\beta \right)}{\partial \left( \partial _\mu A_\nu \right)} = \eta ^{\alpha^\mu} \eta ^{\beta \nu}## and then it works out, just as you say.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
941
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
7K