Confused about inner models and On

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Models
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inclusion of the class of ordinals, On, within the universe of an inner model of ZFC, specifically , where \kappa is the first inaccessible ordinal. The participant expresses confusion regarding the size of On, its classification as a class rather than a set, and the implications of measurable and supercompact cardinals on the structure of inner models. Key clarifications include the distinction between the inner model and V\kappa, and the understanding that supercompact cardinals do not imply that all ordinals are contained within V\kappa.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC)
  • Familiarity with ordinals and cardinal numbers, particularly measurable and supercompact cardinals
  • Knowledge of inner models and their properties in set theory
  • Concept of elementary embeddings and their role in set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of measurable cardinals and their implications in set theory
  • Learn about the structure and characteristics of inner models in ZFC
  • Explore the concept of elementary embeddings and their applications in set theory
  • Investigate the relationship between supercompact cardinals and transitive models
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, set theorists, and students of advanced set theory seeking to deepen their understanding of inner models, ordinals, and cardinality within the framework of ZFC.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
256
I do not understand how On, the class of ordinals, can be included in the universe of an inner model of ZFC such as < V\kappa, epsilon>, where \kappa is the first inaccessible ordinal. My confused attempts to do so have led me to believe that I am getting off on the wrong foot in my analysis, that there is something very basic that I am missing here. I list four of my dead-ends, to show what sort of confusion I am asking someone to lead me out of.

One, it would seem that On was simply too big. For example, On would contain the ordinal that is associated with the cardinal number \alpha, where a is a measurable cardinal, there are at least a Ramsey cardinals below \alpha. \alpha is much larger than the first inaccessible \kappa, so how would so many ordinals fit into V\kappa?

Two, V\kappa can be, in a higher order, be construed as a set, whereas On can never be anything but a class. So how can On be part of V\kappa?

Three: I thought of the collapsing of V by using an appropriate ultrafilter over a measurable cardinal, where also the ordinals would be collapsed, but since there are a lot of ordinals which are skipped by the elementary embedding, having the measurable cardinal as a critical point, then it would seem that On doesn't all get into the universe of the collapsed model. Or does it somehow?

Fourth, I was convinced me that we were not just talking about V\kappa intersect On, because the condition for the supercompact cardinal is that it be lambda-supercompact for all ordinal lambda greater than or equal to the supercompact cardinal, which means that somehow they all have to be in the model.

Any help in the right direction would be appreciated.

PS For some reason, the kappas and alphas got superscripted rather than subscripted, even though it clearly shows subscripting. Sorry. Maybe the two functions, Greek letters and subscripting, don't go together.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Briefly, because inner models are proper classes, not sets. The model <Vκ, ∈> is not an inner model of V, because it (obviously) does not contain all ordinals. It is, however, a transitive model.

I think you are somewhat confused by the definition of supercompact cardinal. If κ is λ-supercompact, that means that there exists a transitive inner model M with λM⊆M and an elementary embedding j:V→M with critical point κ and j(k)>λ. It does not, however, mean that M is Vκ -- M is a much larger class than Vκ.
 
Thank you, Citan Uzuki. You found the major points of my confusion and cleared them up. Very helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K