Undergrad Confused about particle interactions

Click For Summary
In quantum field theory (QFT), particle interactions are mediated by boson exchange, typically represented in Feynman diagrams. These diagrams illustrate the interaction as a single event, but the reality is that particles like electrons continuously affect each other through ongoing interactions. Feynman diagrams serve as mnemonic devices for calculating probability amplitudes rather than literal representations of particle trajectories. The actual calculations integrate over all possible paths, indicating that the interactions are more complex than depicted. Ultimately, QFT provides expectations for measurements rather than a definitive account of the underlying processes.
kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! As far as I understand, in QFT the interaction between particles is mediated by the exchange of a boson. When doing calculations, one assumes that you have 2 free particles coming in, they interact at a point by exchanging a boson and then they propagate again as free particles, and this is the image the Feynman diagrams show, too. However, (say in the case of 2 electrons) the interaction doesn't take place only once. The electrons feel the effect of each other all the time, so I would imagine that a diagram reflecting this should have a photon exchange at each point along the 2 electron lines. Is this continuous interaction mathematically equivalent to just one interaction at a given point? Or how should I think about the Feynman diagrams? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feynman diagrams aren't spacetime diagrams that show particle trajectories. They're mnemonic devices in which each line and vertex corresponds to a factor in the calculation for the probability amplitude of the depicted process. The calculation actually integrates (in effect) over all the possible spacetime paths that the particles could take.
 
You shouldn't take feynman diagrams too literally as depictions of what happens. They're merely calculational tools and besides that, qft only tells you what you can expect if you measure. It doesn't tell you ontologically what "really happens during the interaction".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K