Confused by D'alembertian operator in EM

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the application of the D'Alembertian operator to the 4-vector potential in electromagnetic theory. Participants express difficulty in understanding the equation involving the D'Alembertian, the 4-vector potential A, and the 4-vector current J. Suggestions are made to utilize external resources for clarification, including a link to a relevant physics forum. The conversation highlights the complexity of the mathematical formulation in electromagnetic theory. Overall, the participants seek a clearer understanding of the relationship between these concepts.
neu
Messages
228
Reaction score
3
I can't understand how the D'Alembertian x 4-vector Vector potential = mu x 4-vector J



Have

\nambla^2\A-1\c^2\ frac{ \partial^{2}A}{\partial {t}^{2} } } = \-mu\J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
forget it i can't do the font
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
669
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
886