Confused by radial vs. centripetal acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between centripetal acceleration (Ac) and radial acceleration (Ar) in circular motion, as outlined in the textbook "JS Physics for Scientists and Engineers." Both accelerations are equal when the radius remains constant, expressed as Ar = Ac = v²/r, with the sign determined by the chosen coordinate system. The negative sign in the equation arises from the direction of acceleration towards the center of the circle, which can be defined as negative based on the sign convention. Additionally, when the radius changes over time, the equation must include the second derivative of radius with respect to time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circular motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of acceleration and velocity
  • Knowledge of vector notation and sign conventions in physics
  • Basic calculus, particularly derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration in detail
  • Learn about the effects of changing radius on acceleration
  • Explore tangential acceleration and its relation to angular motion
  • Investigate the Coriolis Effect and its implications in rotating systems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching circular motion concepts, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of acceleration in rotational dynamics.

eventob
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi

I've been working through some examples from the course material we use in physics class, but one thing keeps confusing me: What is the difference between centripetal and radial acceleration?

For instance, when we have a particle traveling in a circular path, the acceleration towards the center of the circle may be written as Ar (a sub r)=-Ac= - v^2/r, while other times it is written simply as Ac=v^2/r. The textbook (JS Physics for Scientists and Engineers) seems to use both.

Where is the negative sign coming from? I made a quick sketch. Am I right if i think that the radial acceleration is negative in the first circle (to the left) and it is positive in the circle to the right? Is it just due to how I pick the axis and how I define positive direction?


Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • ac.jpg
    ac.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 1,497
Physics news on Phys.org
eventob said:
but one thing keeps confusing me: What is the difference between centripetal and radial acceleration?
Same thing.
For instance, when we have a particle traveling in a circular path, the acceleration towards the center of the circle may be written as Ar (a sub r)=-Ac= - v^2/r, while other times it is written simply as Ac=v^2/r. The textbook (JS Physics for Scientists and Engineers) seems to use both.
v^2/r is the magnitude of the radial acceleration; the direction is toward the center. Whether that's positive or negative just depends on how you define your sign convention.

Where is the negative sign coming from? I made a quick sketch. Am I right if i think that the radial acceleration is negative in the first circle (to the left) and it is positive in the circle to the right? Is it just due to how I pick the axis and how I define positive direction?
Yes.
 
Thank you very much. :)
 
Radial acceleration is equal to centripetal acceleration when the radius remains constant (with a +/- sign depending on definition). If radius changes as a function of time, you have to add the explicit second derivative of radius with respect to time.

a_r = a_c + \ddot{r} = -\omega^2 r + \frac{d^2r}{dt^2}

Similarly, tangential acceleration will pick up a term that depends on the second derivative of angle with respect to time and a Coriolis Effect term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
969
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K