Confusion about synchronization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the synchronization of clocks in a moving train, specifically addressing two scenarios regarding the speed of light. In scenario (1), where the one-way speed of light is constant, the simultaneity "plane" aligns with the train's clocks. In scenario (2), where the one-way speed of light varies, the simultaneity "plane" is skewed relative to the train's clocks. Both scenarios are valid within the framework of relativity, which does not provide a method for determining a preferred frame of reference for synchronization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of simultaneity in physics
  • Knowledge of the one-way speed of light
  • Basic grasp of reference frames and their implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of "Relativity of simultaneity" in detail
  • Explore the implications of different reference frames in special relativity
  • Learn about the synchronization of clocks using Einstein's method
  • Investigate the experimental evidence supporting the constancy of the speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching relativity, and anyone interested in the nuances of time synchronization in moving reference frames.

mananvpanchal
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Suppose, in moving train Observer O is at middle point M, and two clocks is situated at A(rear) and B(front). O has a clock.

I have confusion about time of A and B after synchronization.

I have two scenario, please, tell me which one is right.

(1) If we assume that one way speed of light is same for all.
So, there is no problem if frame is moving or not.

Suppose, light signal takes 2 sec to reach at end and 2 sec for coming back. Using the equation [itex]t=t_1+(t_2-t_1)/2[/itex] we can calculate [itex]t=2[/itex]. So we send "2" signal at [itex]t_o=0[/itex].

[itex]t_o=0, t_a=?, t_b=?[/itex]
[itex]t_o=1, t_a=?, t_b=?[/itex]
[itex]t_o=2, t_a=2, t_b=2[/itex]
[itex]t_o=3, t_a=3, t_b=3[/itex]
[itex]t_o=4, t_a=4, t_b=4[/itex]


(2) If we assume that one way speed of light is not same for all, then motion of frame matters. Suppose, light signal takes 1 sec to reach at A and 3 sec for coming back, 3 sec to reach at B and 1 sec for coming back. Using the same equation we can calculate [itex]t=2[/itex]. So we send "2" signal at [itex]t_o=0[/itex].

[itex]t_o=0, t_a=?, t_b=?[/itex]
[itex]t_o=1, t_a=2, t_b=?[/itex]
[itex]t_o=2, t_a=3, t_b=?[/itex]
[itex]t_o=3, t_a=4, t_b=2[/itex]
[itex]t_o=4, t_a=5, t_b=3[/itex]

Please, tell me which is right. If both wrong then please tell me how to synchronize clocks in moving frame.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mananvpanchal said:
Please, tell me which is right. If both wrong then please tell me how to synchronize clocks in moving frame.
Both are right. You just have one more simultaneity "plane" in addition to simultaneity of train clocks and it is different in cases (1) and (2). In case (1) this simultaneity "plane" is the same as for train clocks. In case (2) this simultaneity "plane" is skewed in respect to train clocks.

Basically it looks like you are asking how to determine preferred frame. But relativity does not provide any means how to do that. So either you assume it in arbitrary fashion or do without it.

And maybe this can help Relativity of simultaneity
 
zonde said:
Both are right. You just have one more simultaneity "plane" in addition to simultaneity of train clocks and it is different in cases (1) and (2). In case (1) this simultaneity "plane" is the same as for train clocks. In case (2) this simultaneity "plane" is skewed in respect to train clocks.

Basically it looks like you are asking how to determine preferred frame. But relativity does not provide any means how to do that. So either you assume it in arbitrary fashion or do without it.

And maybe this can help Relativity of simultaneity

Thanks for reply

Yes, I was confused that which synchronization is right for train frame.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K