Twin Paradox (3 objects version)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter h1a8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Twin paradox
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
32 replies · 4K views
Sagittarius A-Star said:
Equation (1) would also be valid, if I had chosen the same event as origin for both frames.
Yes. This is in agreement with what I said. Just remove the ##\Delta##s from Equation (1) and you have the Lorentz transformation bewteen the two frames when they both have the same event as the origin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeterDonis said:
Just remove the ##\Delta##s from Equation (1) and you have the Lorentz transformation bewteen the two frames when they both have the same event as the origin.
Yes. If ##\Delta x## gets replaced by ##x## (and the same for y, z, t coordinates) , this means, that ##x_2 - x_1## gets replaced by ##x - 0##. This would be equivalent to defining the origin as one of the two events.

Source for Lorentz transformation of deltas and differentials (equations 7 and 8):
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article...nematics#Galilean_and_Lorentz_transformations
 
Last edited:
Of course, Minkowski space is not only a Lorentzian vector space but an affine manifold with the translations as additional symmetry, i.e., the complete continuous symmetry group is the proper orthochronous Poincare group, including space-time translations.