Confusion with formulas for wavefunctions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the appropriate formulas for wavefunctions in 2D and 3D problems. The original poster is uncertain about transitioning from a formula involving sqrt(8) to a simpler form and whether to use their notes or a different source. Participants clarify that the 2D problem can be approached by separating variables, allowing the wave function to be expressed as a product of functions dependent on x and y. There is emphasis on the need for the original poster to solve the 2D problem independently, despite having found solutions for 1D and 3D cases. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the wave function for the 2D problem is indeed separable.
Cocoleia
Messages
293
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I am working on this problem:
upload_2017-4-1_16-21-29.png


The formula I am given in my notes is:
upload_2017-4-1_16-26-42.png

I found a website which explains this problem, and they give this formula:
upload_2017-4-1_16-27-8.png

But then, their answer is:
upload_2017-4-1_16-27-48.png

And I don't see how they went from sqrt(8) to 2 on the numerator. I am confused which formula to use where.
I am confused as to which formula I should use... my notes don't make any difference between L1, L2 and L3, but then it doesn't matter in this case in the end.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have found a solution for the 3D problem. Yours is the 2D problem, which is slightly different.
 
PeroK said:
You have found a solution for the 3D problem. Yours is the 2D problem, which is slightly different.
The solution I found was supposed to be for the exact same problem I am working on. In this case do I use the formula from my notes ? Or there is a completely different one that I am forgetting ?
 
PeroK said:
You have found a solution for the 3D problem. Yours is the 2D problem, which is slightly different.
Could I use this one:
upload_2017-4-1_16-52-6.png

and then add the y-component somehow ?
 
Cocoleia said:
Could I use this one:
and then add the y-component somehow ?

You've found the 1D solution and the 3D solution. I think you are supposed to solve the 2D problem for yourself!
 
Cocoleia said:
Could I use this one:
View attachment 115925
and then add the y-component somehow ?

Yes, your problem in 2- or 3 dimension is separable. That, is the wave function for the 2-dimensional problem can be written as a product of two wave functions, one depending on ##x## and the other on ##y##.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
587
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
796
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K