Confusions about thermodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around concepts in thermodynamics, particularly focusing on Carnot efficiency, the relationship between temperature and heat energy, and the distinctions between thermal, internal, and heat energy. Participants explore theoretical implications and definitions within the context of heat engines and kinetic theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Carnot efficiency of a heat engine is always less than 100% due to the cold reservoir's temperature being above 0 Kelvin.
  • There is a proposed analogy that heat energy affects internal energy, which in turn affects temperature, with the condition that if heat energy does not affect internal energy, it will not affect temperature.
  • Participants discuss the differences between thermal energy, internal energy, and heat energy, with varying definitions and explanations provided.
  • One participant notes that while temperature is connected to internal energy, the relationship is not straightforward, suggesting that higher temperature does not necessarily indicate higher internal energy.
  • Another participant references the ideal gas equation, suggesting it links temperature to the average kinetic energy of gas molecules, proposing that for ideal gases, temperature and internal energy are directly related.
  • Concerns are raised about the simplicity of the relationship between temperature and kinetic energy, especially when considering more complex systems like solids and liquids, where heat capacity varies with temperature.
  • One participant emphasizes that temperature is fundamentally related to heat flow, while another highlights the importance of kinetic theory in defining temperature in terms of molecular kinetic energy.
  • A quantitative definition of heat flow direction based on temperature is presented, indicating that heat flows from higher to lower temperature systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express both agreement and disagreement on various points, particularly regarding the relationship between temperature, internal energy, and heat flow. Multiple competing views remain on the definitions and implications of these concepts, and the discussion does not reach a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge the limitations of their definitions and the complexity of the relationships involved, particularly in non-ideal systems and during phase transitions. There is an indication that the understanding of these concepts may depend on specific conditions or assumptions.

Faiq
Messages
347
Reaction score
16
1. Can I say Carnot efficiency of a heat engine is always smaller than 100 because the temperature of cold reservoir is always greater than 0 Kelvin?
2. Is the following analogy correct to describe the relation between temperature and heat energy?
"Heat energy affects internal energy which affects temperature. If heat energy doesn't affect internal energy, it won't affect the temperature."
3. What is the difference between thermal, internal and heat energy?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
1. Yes
2. Yes...temp is an indication of internal energy
3...wait to see what comes
 
Faiq said:
1. Can I say Carnot efficiency of a heat engine is always smaller than 100 because the temperature of cold reservoir is always greater than 0K?
2. Is the following analogy correct to describe the relation between temperature and heat energy?
"Heat energy affects internal energy which affects temperature. If heat energy doesn't affect internal energy, it won't affect the temperature."
3. What is the difference between thermal, internal and heat energy?
1.Yes. The carnot efficiency will always be below 100 percent.And a realistic efficiency will always be smaller than the carnot efficiency.
But that seems a bit trivial, to be honest.
Your second and third question can probably be answered if you read the articles of the terms on hyperphysics.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/temper.html#c1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/inteng.html#c2
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/heat.html#c1

A quick explanation(although not entirely correct) would be:
Thermal energy is all of the kinetic energy of the constituent atoms/molecules in an object/system.
(obviously the disordered kinetic energy not any collective movement like a ball flying through the air)
Internal energy is thermal energy but also considers potential energies associated with intermolecular forces and such.For example the potential energy of the objects state(as in liquid, solid, gaseous)
Heat is the energy that is transferred in a spontaneous process(conduction/radiation/convection) from one system to another.
I have also used heat as any energy added to a system as thermal energy(like when "heating" up a wire through electrical resistance).
But I don't know whether that is actually an incorrect use of the word.
Temperature is a quantity that describes how heat will flow.
If two objects have different temperatures heat will flow from the object with higher temperature to the object with lower temperature.
Obviously, temperature is connected to internal energy but not really in a simple way.
Higher temperature does not necessarily indicate higher internal energy.
 
Last edited:
"Obviously, temperature is connected to internal energy but not really in a simple way."
The derivation of the ideal gas equation, PV =nRT, makes a direct link between temperature, T, and average translational KE of gas molecules. In fact you could say that the ideal gas equation gives a physical meaning to what is meant by temperature (absolute temperature T)...It is a measure of the KE of gas molecules. For ideal gases temperature (absolute temp T) and internal energy are one and the same thing, higher temperature means higher KE of molecules means higher internal energy.
 
In an ideal monoatomic gas, temperature and kinetic energy are proportional.That is true.
But that is one specific case. And such a neat relationship is (to my knowledge) only true for very specific cases.
Once you introduce rotational and vibrational motions of the gas molecules you get a change in heat capacity with temperatures.
As shown on in this diagram : http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/imgkin/shmh.gif
When we talk about solids it gets worse.The relationship follows a curve that looks somewhat like logistical growth and tends to one maximum heat capacity for all substances.But the curve isn't the same for each solid.Some substances' heat capacity increases slower or faster than the heat capacity of others.
And as far as I know we cannot even generally predict the molar heat capacity of liquids in one formula.
If you were to introduce phase transitions, things would become even worse.
Objects at the same temperature can have vastly different densities of thermal/internal energy.
That is why I would advise against treating thermal energy similar to temperature.

Temperature is a quantity that very closely relates to the flow of heat.That is the most important or almost defining property in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lychette
'Temperature is a quantity that very closely relates to the flow of heat.That is the most important or almost defining property in my opinion.'
closely related to heat transfer but does not tell you what Temperature IS !
I am in great agreement with you but I prefer the results of kinetic theory which gives a meaning to temperature...KE of molecules.
I have enjoyed this post !
 
Basically, temperature tells you which direction heat will spontaneously flow if you put two systems in contact. Heat will flow from the system with lower (reciprocal of temperature) to higher (reciprocal of temperature). For positive temperatures, that means heat will flow from higher temperature to lower temperature.
A more quantitative definition is given by the equation:
##\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial U}##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
9K