MHB Congruence of ACB & CED: Similarity Chapter

  • Thread starter Thread starter slwarrior64
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
ACB and CED are confirmed to be congruent, while the term "similarity" is deemed unnecessary in this context. Triangle ABC is established as a right triangle, and although triangle CED's right angle status isn't explicitly stated, it is implied for the problem's validity. The congruence of angles ACB and CED leads to the conclusion that angles CAB and DCE are also congruent, resulting in angle ACE being a right angle. Consequently, triangle ACE is identified as a right triangle with legs measuring 7 and 24, allowing for the calculation of length AE using the Pythagorean theorem. This discussion emphasizes the importance of congruence in understanding the relationships between the triangles involved.
slwarrior64
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
1603414504785.png

Only use that ACB and CED are congruent, not any other symbols in the diagram.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think "similarity" is useful here (and the two triangles are definitely NOT "congruent". We are given that triangle ABC is a right triangle. (It is not specifically said that triangle CED is a right triangle but if angle CDE is not a right angle this problem is un-doable.) Angle ACB is congruent to angle CED. Since both triangles are right angles it follows that angles CAB and DCE are congruent and then that angle ACE is a right angle! So triangle ACE is a right triangle with legs of length 7 and 24. The length of AE follows from the Pythagorean theorem.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top