Comparing coefficients of polynomial congruences.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the AKS Primality Test and its implications for polynomial congruences. It establishes that for gcd(a, n) = 1, the congruence (X - a)^n ≡ X^n - a (mod n) holds if and only if n is prime. The proof involves examining the coefficients of the polynomial and demonstrating a contradiction when n is composite. A key question raised is the conditions under which coefficients can be compared in congruent polynomials, specifically when μa^m ≡ νa^m (mod n) implies μ ≡ ν (mod n).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial congruences and modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with the AKS Primality Test
  • Knowledge of binomial coefficients and their properties
  • Concept of units in the ring of integers modulo n
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of binomial coefficients modulo prime numbers
  • Study the implications of the AKS Primality Test in computational number theory
  • Explore the conditions for cancellation in modular arithmetic
  • Learn about the structure of the ring of integers modulo n and its units
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students of number theory interested in polynomial congruences, primality testing, and modular arithmetic.

Yuqing
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
Today I read about the AKS - Primality test in which the simple theorem

For gcd(a, n) = 1, we have
[tex](X - a)^n\equiv X^n - a\ (mod\ n)[/tex]if and only if n is prime.

was proven. The if direction is quite trivial from the fact that [itex]\binom{p}{k}\equiv 0\ (mod\ p)[/itex] for [itex]1\leq k < p[/itex]. The other direction comes as follows (sketch):

Suppose [itex](X - a)^n\equiv X^n - a\ (mod\ n)[/itex] and that n was composite. Let p be a prime divisor of n and [itex]p^k[/itex] the largest power of p which divides n. Then [itex]p^k[/itex] does not divide [itex]\binom{n}{p^k}[/itex] so we have on the left a coefficient of [itex]x^{p^k}[/itex] which is non-zero and on the right a coefficient which is 0. By comparison of coefficients, we reach a contradiction.

The problem I have with the proof is the last step, the comparison of coefficients. I thought that this cannot be done in general with congruences. This brings me to a more general question which is: When can comparison of coefficients be done for congruent polynomials.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your question is: When are we allowed to conclude ##\mu a^m \equiv \nu a^m \,\operatorname{mod} n \Longrightarrow \mu \equiv \nu \,\operatorname{mod}n\,?##

The equation lives in the ring ##\mathbb{Z}_n##, so the question is: When is ##a^m \in \mathbb{Z}_n## a unit, in which case we can cancel it and are left with ##\mu \equiv \nu\,\operatorname{mod}n\,.## And ##a^m## is a unit, if it is coprime to ##n##. Since ##(a,n)=1## are coprime, so are ##(a^{(p^k)},n)=1\,.## Here we use, that ##\binom{n}{p^k}## is the coefficient at ##a^{(p^k)}\,.##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K