Conjugate e^(iz): Solving for z = nπ

  • Thread starter Thread starter guildmage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the equation \(\exp(i\bar{z}) = \overline{\exp(iz)}\) holds true if and only if \(z = n\pi\) for any integer \(n\). Participants utilized Euler's formula, leading to the conclusion that \(\cos \bar{z} = \cos z\) and \(\sin \bar{z} = -\sin z\). The final resolution confirms that the only solutions occur at integer multiples of \(\pi\), specifically \(z = n\pi\), validating the relationship between the exponential function and trigonometric identities for complex numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler's formula for complex numbers
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities involving sine and cosine
  • Familiarity with complex conjugates and their properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of complex equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Euler's formula in complex analysis
  • Explore the properties of complex conjugates in trigonometric functions
  • Learn about the periodicity of sine and cosine functions in relation to complex numbers
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of complex exponentials
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying complex analysis or trigonometric functions in relation to complex numbers will benefit from this discussion.

guildmage
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to show that

\exp \left( i\bar{z} \right) = \overline{\exp \left( iz \right)}

if and only if

z = n\pi

for any integer n.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Utilizing Euler's formula, I got

\cos \bar{z} = \cos z

and

\sin \bar{z} = -\sin z

Though not fully convinced, I concluded that

\bar{z} = z

This then led me to

\sin z = 0

This obviously led me to the needed conclusion. But was I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Euler's formula is only valid for z a real number. Taking conjugates doesn't get you very far there. You should split z into x+iy and divvy up the exponential first
 
But Euler's formula has already been proven to apply even for complex numbers. My primary concern is whether or not

<br /> \exp \left( i\bar{z} \right) = \overline{\exp \left( iz \right)} <br />

would give me

<br /> \bar{z} = z <br />
 
I didn't mean valid there, I meant useful.

For example:

\cos \bar{z} = \cos z

and

\sin \bar{z} = - \sin z

is satisfied by any imaginary number (just by using the even/oddness of cosine/sine).

The problem though, is that if z is a complex number, you don't have that cos(z) and sin(z) are real numbers, so you can't draw the two relations you have
 
exp(i z)*=exp((i z)*)=exp(i*z*)=exp(-i z*)
it is also easy to see
exp(i z)=exp(-Im[z]+i Re[z])=exp(-Im[z])exp(i Re[z])
 
guildmage said:
\cos \bar{z} = \cos z

and

\sin \bar{z} = -\sin z

Though not fully convinced, I concluded that
<br /> \bar{z} = z <br />

That's a strange conclusion:wink:...If I told you \cos(0)=\cos(100\pi), would you then conclude 0=100\pi?
 
Alright. What if I say

<br /> \cos \bar{z} = \cos z <br />

would give me

<br /> \bar{z} = z + 2n\pi<br />

(Is this correct?)

I will then use it to say that

<br /> \sin \bar{z} = -\sin z <br />

gives me

\sin \left( z + 2n\pi \right) = -\sin z

This implies that

\sin z = -\sin z

Therefore,

z = n\pi
 
Why even use sine?
exp(i z*)=exp(-i z*)
exp(2i z*)=1
z=n pi
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K