Connected rate of change & Calculus

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a calculus problem related to connected rates of change involving a hemisphere and its volume as it fills with water. Participants are exploring the geometric interpretation of the problem and the application of the chain rule in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the chain rule to find the rate of change of height with respect to volume. There is confusion regarding the geometric interpretation of the problem, particularly about the relationship between height and the volume of the hemisphere. Questions arise about the correct height corresponding to the full volume and the implications of integrating over a quarter of the hemisphere.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their reasoning and attempting to clarify their understanding of the geometric aspects of the problem. One participant expresses confusion but later indicates they have resolved their issue, suggesting a shift towards a more productive direction.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a hemisphere with a radius of 3, and participants are considering the implications of height and volume in the context of integration. The original poster's struggle with geometric justification highlights potential assumptions about the relationship between height and volume in the problem setup.

Chewy0087
Messages
368
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


quesaa.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Managed part a) just fine, but the trouble comes with part b. Erm, the thing is I've got the answer just fine using the chain rule;

i worked out dh/dt = 1/(dV/dh) * dV/dt

Giving me 18 * [tex]\frac{1}{\frac{pi}{3}(18h-3h^2)}[/tex]

Now, I thought, "Okay, it says something about 3 so i'll insert that" and i did, giving me the correct answer, but when I was explaining to my friend about it and I thought i could try to explain it to him geometrically by drawing out the semi-circle and the line x = 3 - h I got stuck myself. I just can't justify it to myself geometrically because;

you have the semi-circle passing through (-3 , 0) (0, 3) & (3 , 0) and the vertical line x = 3 - h, now when it's 'full' surely h will equal 6? So the line goes back to (-3,0)...

I think I'm generally confused.

I know it's a long problem but i'd really appreciate any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a hemisphere of radius 3. When it is full, the height of the water equals the radius, 3.
 
Yeah, which is the same reasoning that I used when answering it, however when i sketch the actual graph of y = (9 - x²)^0.5 & x = 3 - h. You'll see what I mean, sureley only when h is 6 will the whole volume of the hemisphere be given when you integrate the volume...
 
never minddddd :PP i got it!

Is it that when you integrate you would only need the cross-section for 1/4 of the hemisphere? (Because it rotates it around)

Thank you! :P
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
35K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K