Connection and tensor-issue with the proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsaad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equation \(\Gamma^{a}_{bc} T^{bc} = 0\), where \(\Gamma^{a}_{bc}\) represents the Christoffel symbols of the Levi-Civita connection and \(T^{bc}\) is a symmetric tensor. Participants emphasize the necessity of specifying the properties of the tensor \(T^{bc}\), particularly its symmetry or antisymmetry, as the equation holds true only for antisymmetric tensors. The conversation also highlights the importance of using correct notation and understanding the implications of working within an orthonormal basis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Christoffel symbols and their role in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of symmetric and antisymmetric tensors
  • Familiarity with orthonormal bases in tensor calculus
  • Proficiency in manipulating tensor equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita connection in detail
  • Learn about the implications of tensor symmetry and antisymmetry
  • Explore the use of orthonormal bases in tensor analysis
  • Investigate the derivation and application of Christoffel symbols in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in differential geometry, physicists working with general relativity, and mathematicians focusing on tensor analysis will benefit from this discussion.

rsaad
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am tying to prove the following:
\Gamma^{a}_{bc} T^{bc} =0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I approached this problem as follows:
dx_{b}/dx^{c} * e^{a} (e^{b} . e^{c}) but it did not yield anything.
Then I expanded the christoeffel symbols into g s and again I am not sure what to do next.So any hints please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your post is incomplete to say the least. What is ##\tau^{bc}## to start with?
 
That's a tensor.
 
a symmetric tensor.
 
In a coordinate basis? A non-holonomic basis?
 
Again you are not being specific enough. ##\Gamma^{a}_{bc}\tau^{bc} = 0## is certainly not true in general for any symmetric tensor ##\tau^{bc}## if ##\Gamma^{a}_{bc}## are the coefficients of the Levi-Civita connection. It is only true in general if ##\tau^{bc}## is antisymmetric so you must specify what exactly the tensor ##\tau^{bc}## is.
 
Γabc are the christoffel symbols/connection and T^(bc) = (e^b,e^c)
 
rsaad said:
Γabc are the christoffel symbols/connection and T^(bc) = (e^b,e^c)

Do you mean T^{bc} = T \left( e^b , e^c \right)?
 
yes.
 
  • #10
And \left\{ e_a \right\} is an orthonormal basis?
 
  • #11
Yes, it is,
 
  • #12
First, In don't think that you should write \Gamma^a{}_{bc} instead of \Gamma^a_{bc}.

Second, what anti-symmetry property does the Levi-Civita connection have with respect to an orthonormal basis?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K