Connection between ppm and length?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mjdwyer23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection Length
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conversion of thermal expansion measurements from parts per million (ppm) to a percentage change in length for complex perovskites. The user, Matt Dwyer, encounters limitations with outdated software that does not record original length, complicating the calculation of the thermal expansion coefficient (alpha). The conversion from ppm to a percentage requires knowledge of the original length, which is not provided by the dilatometer software. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding strain definitions and measurement techniques in thermal expansion studies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal expansion coefficients (alpha)
  • Familiarity with parts per million (ppm) as a unit of measurement
  • Knowledge of dilatometer operation and data acquisition
  • Basic principles of strain measurement in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating thermal expansion coefficients from strain data
  • Learn about modern dilatometer software and its capabilities
  • Explore techniques for measuring original length in thermal expansion experiments
  • Investigate the conversion formulas between ppm and percentage change in length
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for materials scientists, researchers in thermal expansion studies, and students working with dilatometers in experimental physics or engineering contexts.

mjdwyer23
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone-
I'm a junior at U. Penn doing a research project on thermal expansion in complex perovskites. I'm having trouble with a computer program that I'm using to control and obtain data from our dilatometer. The problem is that the software was made in the mid to late 80's, and it only gives data in ppm. What I need to do is convert the expansion to a percent. The program, however, seems to not measure the original length at all. It looks like it tares the sensor at the programmed reference temperature and goes from there, but the alpha (thermal expansion coefficient) needs to be calculated with the original length. Is there any way I can convert from ppm to cm to get a percent change somehow? Thanks

Matt Dwyer
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ppm (parts per million) is short-hand for a strain of 1x10-6 [length/length].

If you need more than that, just ask.
 
This thread is a duplicate from here

I'm going to close this one.

mjdwyer, in the future, please only post your question in one place. It's easier to have a coherent conversation that way. If the post is better suited for another forum, the mentors will move it for you.

Welcome to PF, btw!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
814
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K