Conservation of angular momentum and energy

In summary: So you'll be forming a right triangle. The "adjacent" side of the triangle is just h. The hypotenuse is L/2. So you should see cos \ \theta = \frac{h}{L/2}Do you see why that is true?
  • #1
Hernaner28
263
0

Homework Statement


Hi. Just look at the picture, I will explain it:
index.php?action=dlattach;topic=58603.0;attach=10538.gif

It says that a bullet impacts the rod as you can see (in the center of mass forming a 30 degree angle with the horizontal and keeps inside the rod) with a speed of: 25m/s. The bullet has a mass 0.1Kg, the rod 0.9Kg and the length of the rod is 0.45m.

I'm asked to find the maximum angular displacement that has the rod respect to the vertical. (the bullet keeps in the rod).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



What I did first was to realize that the angular momentum is conserved just when the bullet impacts the rod, after that what is conserved is the energy so I wrote:

[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{i}}=r\wedge mv[/tex]

[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{i}}=\frac{L}{2}mv\sin 120{}^\text{o}[/tex]

And the final angular momentum (when the bullet gets inside the rod):
[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{f}}=I\omega [/tex]
[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{f}}=\left( \frac{M{{L}^{2}}}{3}+m\frac{{{L}^{2}}}{4} \right)\omega [/tex]

So,

[tex] \displaystyle \frac{L}{2}mv\sin 120{}^\text{o}=\left( \frac{M{{L}^{2}}}{3}+m\frac{{{L}^{2}}}{4} \right)\omega [/tex]

And soving for w I get that the initial angular speed is 8.13 rad/s. Now I use conservation of energy:

[tex] \displaystyle \frac{1}{2}I{{\omega }^{2}}=\left( m+M \right)gh[/tex]

where h is the maximum height of the center of mass. Solving for h I get h=0,22m.
But now, how can I get the angle? The correct answer is 79,5 degrees.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hernaner28 said:

Homework Statement


Hi. Just look at the picture, I will explain it:
index.php?action=dlattach;topic=58603.0;attach=10538.gif

It says that a bullet impacts the rod as you can see (in the center of mass forming a 30 degree angle with the horizontal and keeps inside the rod) with a speed of: 25m/s. The bullet has a mass 0.1Kg, the rod 0.9Kg and the length of the rod is 0.45m.

I'm asked to find the maximum angular displacement that has the rod respect to the vertical. (the bullet keeps in the rod).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



What I did first was to realize that the angular momentum is conserved just when the bullet impacts the rod, after that what is conserved is the energy so I wrote:

[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{i}}=r\wedge mv[/tex]

[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{i}}=\frac{L}{2}mv\sin 120{}^\text{o}[/tex]

And the final angular momentum (when the bullet gets inside the rod):
[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{f}}=I\omega [/tex]
[tex] \displaystyle {{L}_{f}}=\left( \frac{M{{L}^{2}}}{3}+m\frac{{{L}^{2}}}{4} \right)\omega [/tex]

So,

[tex] \displaystyle \frac{L}{2}mv\sin 120{}^\text{o}=\left( \frac{M{{L}^{2}}}{3}+m\frac{{{L}^{2}}}{4} \right)\omega [/tex]
Everything looks correct to me so far. :smile:
And soving for w I get that the initial angular speed is 8.13 rad/s.
I ended up getting a different answer (I double checked too). You might want to try recalculating the numbers.
Now I use conservation of energy:

[tex] \displaystyle \frac{1}{2}I{{\omega }^{2}}=\left( m+M \right)gh[/tex]

where h is the maximum height of the center of mass. Solving for h I get h=0,22m.
I think that's the right idea. But if I'm right about your ω being a little off, this number is a little off too.
But now, how can I get the angle? The correct answer is 79,5 degrees.

Draw a diagram with the rod at an angle. Label h on the diagram. (Actually, it might be more intuitive to label 2h; that's what I did anyway.) Also label L with the rod in its original position, and in its final position. You should have a right triangle now. You can use that right triangle to solve for the angle (the maximum angular displacement) in terms of h and L.
 
  • #3
Oh! Yeah! Hohoho! 8 radians per second! Now I realize LOL! Yeah, I probably got my calculator in radian mode instead of degrees (I keep changing it). Now I get 0.30 rad/s which is reasonable.

Alright, yes, the diagram is the first thing I do always. I have that triangle but I don't understand why you say 2h when it's actually 1h. I think you are taking 2h from the floor, arent you? Anyway, I cannot realize how to find out the angular displacement just having h- Thank you!

** h is the height the center of mass displaced. I am not taking it from the floor
 
  • #4
This is what I have:

attachment.php?attachmentid=48730&stc=1&d=1340933012.gif
 

Attachments

  • drawing.gif
    drawing.gif
    35.4 KB · Views: 609
  • #5
Hernaner28 said:
Oh! Yeah! Hohoho! 8 radians per second! Now I realize LOL! Yeah, I probably got my calculator in radian mode instead of degrees (I keep changing it). Now I get 0.30 rad/s which is reasonable.
Wait, hold on. My answer for ω was definitely bigger than 0.3 rad/s (it was more than twice that, actually).

Try that one more time. And yes, make sure your calculator is in degrees. :smile:
Alright, yes, the diagram is the first thing I do always. I have that triangle but I don't understand why you say 2h when it's actually 1h. I think you are taking 2h from the floor, arent you?
Yes, that is what I did. If the center of the rod rises up by h, then the end of the rod rises up by 2h. But you can do it your way if you like, you will just need to draw a smaller triangle.
Anyway, I cannot realize how to find out the angular displacement just having h- Thank you!

** h is the height the center of mass displaced. I am not taking it from the floor
Okay, we'll try it a different way. Label L/2 on the diagram in two places: One at the rod's original position, and again when the rod is at maximum angular displacement (L/2 is at an angle at the latter position). Now label h on the y-axis.

You should see a right triangle now with hypotenuse of L/2. You should now be able to determine what the adjacent side of the triangle is in terms of L/2 and h.

[tex] cos \ \theta = \frac{\mathrm{adjacent}}{\mathrm{hypotensuse}} [/tex]
 
  • #6
I see your diagram now.

Rather than label h somewhere off in the middle, label h on the y-axis, with the "bottom" of h at L/2. Then connect a straight line between the top of h and the point at where the rod's L/2 is at its final position.
 
  • #7
Ahhhh now I see the right triangle! I thought it was not a right angle but now I see it.

BTW now I get 7.4 rad/s LOL!

Thank you very much!
 
  • #8
Wait, the right triangle you say is the one which is connected by O (point of rotation) initial L/2 and final L/2? Now I see two right angles. The one I told you and the other which is formed by connecting O, L/2-h initial and L/2 final
 
  • #9
Hernaner28 said:
Wait, the right triangle you say is the one which is connected by O (point of rotation) initial L/2 and final L/2? Now I see two right angles. The one I told you and the other which is formed by connecting O, L/2-h initial and L/2 final
There may be more than one similar triangle, if one works at it. :smile:

But you've found at least one triangle that's good enough. In one triangle (where the angle in question is at the point O), the adjacent side is (L/2 - h) and the hypotenuse is L/2. With that, you should be able to solve for the maximum angular displacement (i.e. the angle up at O).

And yes, the initial angular velocity of 7.4 rad/s sounds just right (to two significant figures, that is). :approve:
 
  • #10
I got it! Thank you very much!

BTW 7.4 rad/s doesn't mean it completes a spin, does it? It cannot spin because of the gravity, that's why it reaches its maximum value..
 
  • #11
Hernaner28 said:
I got it! Thank you very much!

BTW 7.4 rad/s doesn't mean it completes a spin, does it? It cannot spin because of the gravity, that's why it reaches its maximum value..
It doesn't complete a whole spin. 7.4 rad/sec is just the initial rate of rotation, not the amount of rotation.

The total amount of rotation is your final answer, 79.5o (which converts to around 1.39 rad). That's not even a quarter circle.

You can tell that that is the case by looking at your diagram (and numbers), since h is less than L/2.

(By the way, I used a lot of precision in my calculations, and I came up with an answer that is just a tiny, tiny bit different than 79.5o when rounding. I think the official answer might have a very tiny rounding/precision mistake. But it's really close though, so it's not a big deal)
 
  • #12
Yeah, me too, I got the exact value of h which is:

[tex] \displaystyle h=\frac{3125}{17004}m[/tex]

And the angle is: 79.4438678º . It would round to 79.4º but it's the same!

Thank you!
 
  • #13
Hernaner28 said:
And the angle is: 79.4438678º . It would round to 79.4º but it's the same!

Thank you!
That's precisely the same answer I got. :smile:
 

1. What is conservation of angular momentum and energy?

Conservation of angular momentum and energy is a fundamental law of physics that states that the total angular momentum and energy of a system will remain constant if no external forces or torque act upon it. This means that the total amount of rotational motion and energy in a system will not change over time.

2. How does conservation of angular momentum and energy apply in real-life situations?

Conservation of angular momentum and energy can be observed in many real-life situations, such as the rotation of planets and moons in our solar system, the spinning of a top, and the trajectory of a spinning frisbee. It also plays a crucial role in understanding the movement of objects in space, such as satellites and spacecraft.

3. What is the relationship between angular momentum and energy?

Angular momentum and energy are closely related, as they both involve the motion and rotation of an object. Angular momentum is a measure of the rotational motion of an object, while energy is a measure of the ability to do work. In a closed system, the total angular momentum and energy will remain constant, meaning that any changes in one will result in a corresponding change in the other.

4. Can conservation of angular momentum and energy be violated?

No, conservation of angular momentum and energy is a fundamental law of physics and cannot be violated. It has been extensively tested and has been proven to hold true in all known physical situations. If it appears to be violated in a particular scenario, it is likely due to an incomplete understanding or measurement error.

5. How is conservation of angular momentum and energy related to Newton's laws of motion?

Conservation of angular momentum and energy is a direct consequence of Newton's laws of motion. The first law states that an object at rest will remain at rest and an object in motion will continue in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. In a closed system, there are no external forces acting, so the object's motion will remain unchanged, thus conserving its angular momentum and energy.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
887
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
10
Replies
335
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
683
Back
Top