1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Conservation of angular momentum / finding change in rotational kinetic energy

  1. Mar 3, 2010 #1
    Two disks of identical mass but different radii (r and 2r) are spinning on frictionless bearings at the same angular speed ωo, but in opposite directions. The two disks are brought slowly together. The resulting frictional force between the surfaces eventually brings them to a common angular velocity.

    10-p-052.gif


    (a) What is the magnitude of that final angular velocity in terms of ωo
    [tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex]ωo < - I know that's right.


    (b) What is the change in rotational kinetic energy of the system? (Take K as the initial kinetic energy.) This is what I need help with.


    I used Ke=Iω2, coupled the system, considered one direction negative and one positive, and got [tex]\frac{9}{50}[/tex]mr2ωo2, which is apparently wrong. . .

    Thank you ahead of time!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 3, 2010 #2

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    One mistake you made is that the kinetic energy is equal to K=(1/2)Iω2, not Iω2. If that alone isn't the problem, show the details of your calculation so we can see where you might have gone wrong.

     
  4. Mar 3, 2010 #3
    Well, I tried it quite a few different ways, that was just the last wrong answer I got before deciding to ask for help. Here's what I did:

    1) [tex]\Delta[/tex]Ke = Kf - Ki

    2) [tex]\Delta[/tex]Ke = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]If[tex]\omega[/tex]f2 - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]Ii[tex]\omega[/tex]o2

    3) [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]((2m)(3r2))[tex]\omega[/tex]f2 - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]((2m)(3r2))[tex]\omega[/tex]f2

    4) [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex](6mr2)[tex]\omega[/tex]f2 - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex](6mr2)[tex]\omega[/tex]o2

    5) 3mr2[tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex][tex]\omega[/tex]o2 - 3mr2[tex]\omega[/tex]o2

    et cetera

    I guess I missed some steps the first way through, but I'm sure it's wrong just the same.
     
  5. Mar 3, 2010 #4

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    I don't follow how you calculated the moment of inertia. Could you explain that?
     
  6. Mar 4, 2010 #5

    collinsmark

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Perhaps I can just start you out on the right path. :smile: First off, the moment of inertia of a disk is

    [tex] I _{\mbox{disk}} = \frac{mr^2}{2} [/tex]

    From there, I suggest that you write out the individual initial kinetic energies of each disk, at least as a start. You can always simplify later.

    [tex] K_i = \frac{1}{2}I_1 \omega_0^2 + \frac{1}{2}I_2 \omega_0^2 [/tex]

    Once you have this written out (as above) you can then simplify it a little now, or simplify it later.

    Either way, note that

    [tex] I_1 = \frac{mr^2}{2} [/tex]

    and

    [tex] I_2 = \frac{m(2r)^2}{2}[/tex]

    Adding these together does not give the ((2m)(3r2)) that you were using in your previous post.
     
  7. Mar 4, 2010 #6
  8. Mar 4, 2010 #7

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    I know how to calculate the moment of inertia. What I don't get is what you did.
     
  9. Mar 4, 2010 #8
    so [tex] K_i = \frac{3}{4}mr^2\omega_0^2 [/tex] ?
    and [tex] K_f = \frac{9}{50}mr^2\omega_0^2 [/tex]
    thus [tex] \Delta K = \frac{57}{100}mr^2\omega_0^2}[/tex]

    I feel like such an idiot. . .
     
  10. Mar 4, 2010 #9
    Oh, I'm sorry. I basically treated the disks as one big disk.
     
  11. Mar 4, 2010 #10
    I have spent more than two and a half hours on this problem and have gotten nowhere. I give up. Thank you vela and collinsmark for your help.
     
  12. Mar 4, 2010 #11

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    You're really close; you're just not calculating the rotational masses correctly, probably just algebra mistakes. Once you clear that up, you'll get the right answer. It might be good to take a break and come back to it later. Errors you can't see right now may pop out clear as day later.
     
  13. Mar 4, 2010 #12
    I tried that already, on Monday and Tuesday.

    I guess I'm just not "physics material."

    I really appreciate your time though.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Conservation of angular momentum / finding change in rotational kinetic energy
Loading...