Conservation of angular momentum on a piano stool

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a student on a piano stool rotating with varying angular speeds while holding masses at different distances from the axis of rotation. The context is centered around the conservation of angular momentum and the calculation of kinetic energy based on the moment of inertia of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of angular momentum and how the moment of inertia changes as the student pulls the masses inward. There are attempts to relate the initial and final states of the system using the moment of inertia and angular speeds. Questions arise about how to incorporate the masses into the total moment of inertia and the calculations for kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the moment of inertia and its contributions from the masses. Some guidance has been provided regarding the calculations needed for kinetic energy, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answers yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem's parameters, including the given moment of inertia for the student and stool, and the need to account for the masses as point objects at varying distances.

map7s
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
A student on a piano stool rotates freely with an angular speed of 3.33 rev/s. The student holds a 1.44 kg mass in each outstretched arm, 0.759 m from the axis of rotation. The combined moment of inertia of the student and the stool, ignoring the two masses, is 4.34 kgm2, a value that remains constant.
(a) As the student pulls his arms inward, his angular speed increases to 3.54 rev/s. How far are the masses from the axis of rotation at this time, considering the masses to be points?
(b) Calculate the initial and final kinetic energy of the system.

For the first part, I tried doing mr^2w(initial)=mr^2w(final) and it said that my answer was within 10% of the correct answer. I tried doing different variations, playing around with the given moment of inertia, but I couldn't figure out how to factor it in along with the varying radius.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You realize that angular momentum is conserved. You need to figure out how the rotational inertia of the total system (student+stool+masses) changes as the masses are brought closer to the center. What's the contribution of the masses to the total rotational inertia?
 
Well, the masses have to be factored in twice since there are two of them but I'm not sure how to combine it with the initial moment of inertia given in the problem...
 
What's the moment of inertia of a point mass M at a distance R from an axis?
 
moment of inertia I=mr^2
 
Exactly. So what's the total moment of inertia of the system at those two points (arms outstretched; arms in)?
 
arms outstretched: mr^2=(2)(1.44)(0.759)^2
arms in: mr^2=(2)(1.44)r^2
 
That's just the contribution of the two masses. Now add that to the moment of inertia of the "student+stool", which is given as a constant.
 
...and so to calculate the kinetic energies I use the equation KE=1/2 Iw^2=1/2 [I+2mr^2](w^2) ?
 
  • #10
map7s said:
...and so to calculate the kinetic energies I use the equation KE=1/2 Iw^2=1/2 [I+2mr^2](w^2) ?
That should do it.
 
  • #11
I tried using that equation and plugging in my numbers, but apparently it isn't correct...
 
  • #12
map7s said:
I tried using that equation and plugging in my numbers, but apparently it isn't correct...
OK.. You have two different I involved. I assumed from what you did earlier you had them distinguished. So let's be more explicit.

KE=1/2 (I_total)w^2=1/2 [(I_ss)+2mr^2](w^2)

where I_ss is the assumed constant moment of inertia of the student and stool combination. You have two calculations to do for the two different positions of the masses with their corresponding angular velocities. If you got the correct r earlier, you should be getting the correct KE.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K