Conservation of angular momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation of angular momentum, specifically focusing on a beam and a man interacting in a frictionless environment. The scenario describes a beam sliding on ice and a man grabbing it, leading to a rotational motion that needs to be analyzed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial moment of inertia and angular velocity of the system, questioning the application of angular momentum equations. There are attempts to understand the relationship between linear and angular momentum, particularly how the initial conditions affect the calculations. Some participants explore different methods for calculating angular momentum and moment of inertia.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the use of angular momentum equations. There is an exploration of different approaches to the problem, and some participants express understanding of the concepts as they clarify the relationships between linear and angular motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the center of mass and the conditions before the collision, as well as the implications of the angular momentum equations in relation to the setup of the problem.

deuce123
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 220-kg beam 2.8 m in length slides broadside down the ice with a speed of 23 m/s . A 68-kgman at rest grabs one end as it goes past and hangs on as both he and the beam go spinning down the ice. Assume frictionless motion. (Figure 1)

Homework Equations


L1=L2
Iω=L
GIANCOLI.ch11.p50.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


With what angular velocity does the system rotate about its cm? For this question i tried to use the initial moment of inertia w.r.t the CM by...[ 1/12Ml^2 + Mh^2] ω------ where l=2.8m M=220kg and h=.33m ----- For some reason this doesn't work. I'm positive the other side of the equation i listed is correct, i had it checked out. I ended up getting the answer for this question too see where i went wrong, it ended up being ω=6.8 rad/s--- And they used (Mhv)
M=220kg h=.33m v=23 m/s. I'm not sure how that equates too being angular momentum (Iω), but it worked for the answer. Can someone explain to me why they used that and why it worked. Also how else can you approach the initial angular momentum, somewhere along the lines of what i was doing. Thank you,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK so h=0.33m is the distance from the CM of the beam to the CM of the system.

deuce123 said:
For this question i tried to use the initial moment of inertia w.r.t the CM by...[ 1/12Ml^2 + Mh^2] ω------ where l=2.8m M=220kg and h=.33m ----- For some reason this doesn't work.

That's because before the collision the beam isn't rotating about the systems CoM. It's traveling in a straight line "past" the systems CoM.

deuce123 said:
they used (Mhv)
M=220kg h=.33m v=23 m/s. I'm not sure how that equates too being angular momentum (Iω),

That's the correct equation for a particle mass m moving in a straight line past a point. See second paragraph..

http://courses.ncssm.edu/apb11o/resources/guides/G11-4.angmom.htm

In your case r=h and just before the collision the sinθ=1 so the angular momentum is Mhv.
 
deuce123 said:
Also how else can you approach the initial angular momentum, somewhere along the lines of what i was doing.

If you want to do it "your way" you need to calculate the moment of inertia as if it's a particle of mass 220kg moving past the system CoM...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia

For a particle mass m and radius h..

I = mh2
ω = V/h

Angular Momentum
= I*ω
= mh2*V/h
h cancels
= mhv
same as before
 
CWatters said:
OK so h=0.33m is the distance from the CM of the beam to the CM of the system.
That's because before the collision the beam isn't rotating about the systems CoM. It's traveling in a straight line "past" the systems CoM.
That's the correct equation for a particle mass m moving in a straight line past a point. See second paragraph..

http://courses.ncssm.edu/apb11o/resources/guides/G11-4.angmom.htm

In your case r=h and just before the collision the sinθ=1 so the angular momentum is Mhv.
Thank you i understand now. Also, how come they only want the component rsin? Even for particles that are far away from the axis of rotation. Is it because that there is no angular momenta till it hits that point?
 
deuce123 said:
Also, how come they only want the component rsin? Even for particles that are far away from the axis of rotation. Is it because that there is no angular momenta till it hits that point?

No. rSinθ gives you the tangential offset shown on this this diagram (left hand diagram). It's the same rule for calculating the lever arm when working out the torque produced by a force.

If the particle passes through the centre point then the radius r is unchanged but rSinθ=0 and the angular momentum equals zero as you would expect (Right hand diagram.
Angular momentum.jpg
 
A tip: with such problems, there is nearly always an easier way than finding the common mass centre.
Say the beam has mass M, length L and initial speed u. The man has mass m, and just after the impact the beam's mass centre has linear speed v and angular speed w.
What is the man's linear speed just after impact?
What equation do you get for linear momentum?
For angular momentum, I suggest using as reference axis either the man's initial position or the position of the beam's mass centre at instant of impact. Either way, just find the before and after angular momenta of each component and write out the conservation equation.

Fwiw, I get nearly double the answer you quote. 23m/s is very fast. The man will be seriously injured.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K