Conservation of angular momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of angular momentum in a system involving a 220-kg beam and a 68-kg man. The beam slides at 23 m/s and the man grabs it, leading to a rotational motion about the center of mass (CM). The correct approach to calculate angular momentum involves using the equation L = Iω, where I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular velocity. The participants clarify that before the collision, the beam travels in a straight line past the system's CM, and the angular momentum can be calculated using Mhv, where M is the mass, h is the distance from the CM, and v is the velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its conservation principles
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of linear and angular velocity relationships
  • Basic mechanics involving collisions and rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum equations in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about calculating moment of inertia for various shapes and systems
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocities in collision scenarios
  • Investigate real-world applications of angular momentum conservation in sports and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of angular momentum and rotational dynamics in real-world applications.

deuce123
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 220-kg beam 2.8 m in length slides broadside down the ice with a speed of 23 m/s . A 68-kgman at rest grabs one end as it goes past and hangs on as both he and the beam go spinning down the ice. Assume frictionless motion. (Figure 1)

Homework Equations


L1=L2
Iω=L
GIANCOLI.ch11.p50.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


With what angular velocity does the system rotate about its cm? For this question i tried to use the initial moment of inertia w.r.t the CM by...[ 1/12Ml^2 + Mh^2] ω------ where l=2.8m M=220kg and h=.33m ----- For some reason this doesn't work. I'm positive the other side of the equation i listed is correct, i had it checked out. I ended up getting the answer for this question too see where i went wrong, it ended up being ω=6.8 rad/s--- And they used (Mhv)
M=220kg h=.33m v=23 m/s. I'm not sure how that equates too being angular momentum (Iω), but it worked for the answer. Can someone explain to me why they used that and why it worked. Also how else can you approach the initial angular momentum, somewhere along the lines of what i was doing. Thank you,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK so h=0.33m is the distance from the CM of the beam to the CM of the system.

deuce123 said:
For this question i tried to use the initial moment of inertia w.r.t the CM by...[ 1/12Ml^2 + Mh^2] ω------ where l=2.8m M=220kg and h=.33m ----- For some reason this doesn't work.

That's because before the collision the beam isn't rotating about the systems CoM. It's traveling in a straight line "past" the systems CoM.

deuce123 said:
they used (Mhv)
M=220kg h=.33m v=23 m/s. I'm not sure how that equates too being angular momentum (Iω),

That's the correct equation for a particle mass m moving in a straight line past a point. See second paragraph..

http://courses.ncssm.edu/apb11o/resources/guides/G11-4.angmom.htm

In your case r=h and just before the collision the sinθ=1 so the angular momentum is Mhv.
 
deuce123 said:
Also how else can you approach the initial angular momentum, somewhere along the lines of what i was doing.

If you want to do it "your way" you need to calculate the moment of inertia as if it's a particle of mass 220kg moving past the system CoM...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia

For a particle mass m and radius h..

I = mh2
ω = V/h

Angular Momentum
= I*ω
= mh2*V/h
h cancels
= mhv
same as before
 
CWatters said:
OK so h=0.33m is the distance from the CM of the beam to the CM of the system.
That's because before the collision the beam isn't rotating about the systems CoM. It's traveling in a straight line "past" the systems CoM.
That's the correct equation for a particle mass m moving in a straight line past a point. See second paragraph..

http://courses.ncssm.edu/apb11o/resources/guides/G11-4.angmom.htm

In your case r=h and just before the collision the sinθ=1 so the angular momentum is Mhv.
Thank you i understand now. Also, how come they only want the component rsin? Even for particles that are far away from the axis of rotation. Is it because that there is no angular momenta till it hits that point?
 
deuce123 said:
Also, how come they only want the component rsin? Even for particles that are far away from the axis of rotation. Is it because that there is no angular momenta till it hits that point?

No. rSinθ gives you the tangential offset shown on this this diagram (left hand diagram). It's the same rule for calculating the lever arm when working out the torque produced by a force.

If the particle passes through the centre point then the radius r is unchanged but rSinθ=0 and the angular momentum equals zero as you would expect (Right hand diagram.
Angular momentum.jpg
 
A tip: with such problems, there is nearly always an easier way than finding the common mass centre.
Say the beam has mass M, length L and initial speed u. The man has mass m, and just after the impact the beam's mass centre has linear speed v and angular speed w.
What is the man's linear speed just after impact?
What equation do you get for linear momentum?
For angular momentum, I suggest using as reference axis either the man's initial position or the position of the beam's mass centre at instant of impact. Either way, just find the before and after angular momenta of each component and write out the conservation equation.

Fwiw, I get nearly double the answer you quote. 23m/s is very fast. The man will be seriously injured.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K