Conservation of Energy and calculating potential energy?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation of energy, specifically focusing on calculating gravitational potential energy (U) for a rock sliding down a hillside. The scenario includes parameters such as mass, height, and the coefficient of friction, prompting participants to analyze the relevance of each in the context of potential energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of gravitational potential energy using the formula U = mgh, questioning the relevance of additional information such as the length of the hillside and the coefficient of friction. Some express confusion about why the angle of the hillside does not factor into the potential energy calculation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of gravitational potential energy and its independence from certain variables. There is an ongoing exploration of why specific details in the problem may be extraneous, and some guidance has been offered regarding the correct approach to calculating potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may contain irrelevant information, and there is a focus on understanding the implications of friction and the path taken in a conservative field. The discussion reflects a mix of assumptions about the role of various parameters in energy calculations.

suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
during a rockslide a 520kg rock slides from rest down a hillside that is 500m long and 300m high. The coeeficient of kinetic friction is 0.25. If the gravitational potential energy [tex]U[/tex] of the rock-earth system is zero at the bottom of the hill, what is the value of [tex]U[/tex] just beofre it slides?

I know this is wrong, but I tried:

[tex]U_g = mghcos \Theta[/tex]
[tex]U_g = 9.2 x 10^5J[/tex]

What do I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a good question. There is too much information given in the problem. Specifically, neither the length of the hillside nor the coefficient of friction are important. The gravitational potential energy is just U = mgh. The statement about U = 0 at the bottom of the hill just establishes that h = 0 at the bottom of the hill (since m and g are never 0).

The important part is: do you understand why the friction and length are unimportant in this question?

-Dale
 
Last edited:
well friction wouldn't matter because it only has to do with thermal energy?

but there are more parts to the question, that is why a lot of the info seems useless.

Why doesn't the angle come into play when calculating potential energy?
 
suspenc3 said:
well friction wouldn't matter because it only has to do with thermal energy?
but there are more parts to the question, that is why a lot of the info seems useless.
Why doesn't the angle come into play when calculating potential energy?

Potential energy is the energy a mass has at rest, potentially it could fall and turn that energy into kinetic energy. change in U is = change in K [conservation of energy] U doesn't even care about any angles because there is no angle involved with a rock sitting in one place.
 
That and also gravity is a conservative field. Meaning that the path you take (the angle) is irrelevant, only the change in the potential is important.

Suspenc3, you hit the key idea about the friction. Basically, if it were frictionless than all of the PE at the top would go into KE at the bottom. With the friction some of the PE will go to heat and some will go to KE, but the initial PE is still the same.

-Dale
 
Ya..Other information are irrelevent.
You can simply use [tex]mgh[/tex] to find the change in GPE, then add it to zero.. U shld get an answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K