Conservation of energy and friction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a body moving along a quarter of a vertical circle while subject to friction. Participants explore the implications of friction on the conservation of energy and seek to derive the final velocity of the body at the top of the circle, considering the effects of both gravitational and frictional forces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that deriving the final velocity in the presence of friction is more complex than in purely conservative systems.
  • One participant suggests that the work done by friction can be expressed as \(\mu N \frac{\pi R}{2}\), where \(\mu\) is the coefficient of friction and \(N\) is the normal force.
  • Another participant clarifies that in a vertical circle, the normal force is influenced by both the centripetal acceleration and gravitational force, leading to the expression \(N = mv^2/R + mg \cos(\theta)\).
  • Concerns are raised about how to evaluate the work done by friction, particularly regarding the dependence of friction on both velocity and the angle traversed along the circle.
  • Participants discuss the need to integrate the forces acting on the body to find the work done by friction, with one suggesting that friction and displacement are always in opposite directions.
  • There is a suggestion to derive the equations of motion in both tangential and radial directions to clarify the relationship between velocity and angle.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the integration process needed to find the work done by friction, indicating that the relationship between velocity and angle is not straightforward.
  • Another participant acknowledges the complexity of the mathematics involved but encourages collaboration to compare solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity introduced by friction in the analysis but have not reached consensus on the specific methods to derive the final velocity or the work done by friction. Multiple competing views and approaches remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence of the normal force on the angle traversed and the need for integration to evaluate work done by friction, highlighting the unresolved nature of these mathematical steps.

llandau
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
If a body moves along a quarter of a circle and it is subject only to conservative forces, it is relatively easy to deduce the equation of motion. But if friction comes into action, it seems more difficult. Suppose that a body has initial velocity v_0 and that it moves along a quarter of a circle of radius R, subject also to friction (coefficient of friction is known). Is it still possible, even if conservation of energy can't be applied, to derive the final velocity at the top?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
llandau said:
If a body moves along a quarter of a circle and it is subject only to conservative forces, it is relatively easy to deduce the equation of motion. But if friction comes into action, it seems more difficult. Suppose that a body has initial velocity v_0 and that it moves along a quarter of a circle of radius R, subject also to friction (coefficient of friction is known). Is it still possible, even if conservation of energy can't be applied, to derive the final velocity at the top?

The particle travels a distance of [tex]\pi[/tex]R/2. Friction does work to it along that path equal to [tex]\mu[/tex]N[tex]\pi[/tex]R/2, where [tex]\mu[/tex] is the coefficient of friction and N is the normal force. (You need to work out the expression for N if the particle moves upward in a gravitational field...or do you want to make life simple and let the circle be horizontal?)

The work done by friction equals the reduction of kinetic energy.
 
Yes, I should have been more precise.. I meant that the circle is vertical so the normal force along the motion should be mv^2/R+mgcos(theta). Now, I wonder if it is possible to evaluate the work done by friction in this case elementary, so that the final velocity can be easily obtained... Thanks in advance
 
For normal force you would need to write out the equations of Newton's second law in the tangential and normal directions.That should provide you an N dependent on angle traversed along the circle.Then you would need to perform an integration along the length of the path for work done by friction. That should be relatively easy considering friction and displacement always are 180 degrees to each other.
 
I actually tried that way:

- in the radial direction, the law of motion is: N-mgcos(theta)=mv^2/R
- in the tangential direction, the only force is friction, that is (mu)m(gcos(theta)+v^2/R).
Now, what I find confusing is this: I should integrate to find the work done by friction, but with respect to what? It seems here that friction depends on v and on theta and the relation between the two is not obvious (to me).
 
in the tangential direction, the only force is friction, that is (mu)m(gcos(theta)+v^2/R).

Are you sure this is correct?
 
You are right, plus the component of gravity mg sin(theta). Being gravity conservative, the real problem is how to calculate the work done by friction. Do you have a solution?
 
Acceleration in the tangential direction is dv/dt where v is speed of the particle by definition. Now that you have an equation of the Second Law in the tangential direction containing a velocity term(by direct substitution for N from first eqn,) and the differential dv integrate to get v(t).That should be the magnitude of speed as a function of time. Then put it back in the first equation to calculate N(t). That should help with calculating the work of friction.

Lev, the logic seems good enough to me but the math is scary looking. Have a go.I will try too.Hell maybe we can compare our solutions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K