Conservation of energy in general relativity & non-existence of PMMs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of general relativity (GR) on the law of conservation of energy, particularly in the context of cosmology. It is established that energy conservation becomes vacuous or invalid within GR, which directly impacts the feasibility of creating perpetual motion machines (PMMs). The absence of a global "point in time" and a clear definition of "total energy" in GR further solidifies the impossibility of PMMs. Thus, the mathematical complexities of GR prevent the generation of perpetual motion, reinforcing the fundamental laws of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with the concept of energy conservation in physics
  • Knowledge of cosmological principles and their implications
  • Basic grasp of the concept of perpetual motion machines (PMMs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of general relativity on energy conservation laws
  • Explore the mathematical framework of general relativity
  • Study the principles behind perpetual motion machines and their historical context
  • Investigate alternative theories of physics that challenge or expand upon classical energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the intersections of general relativity, energy conservation, and the theoretical limits of perpetual motion machines.

sshai45
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Hi.

I saw this:

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/35431/is-the-law-of-conservation-of-energy-still-valid

The energy conservation becomes vacuous or invalid in the general theory of relativity and especially in cosmology.

Now, if that's the case, then I wonder about a related question: can general relativity be used to create perpetual motion machines? If not, then why not (i.e. how does energy conservation break down in such a way that the impossibility of PMMs is maintained)? If it can, then what would they look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A law of energy conservation would need a proper way to define "the total energy at some point in time" - but in GR, there is no global "point in time" at all - and there is no clear way to define "the total energy" either. I doubt that you can use those mathematical issues to generate perpetual motion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K