Conservation of Energy Physics Olympiad

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the conservation of energy as a ball rolls down a ramp and is projected vertically upward. The problem explores the relationship between gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy, and rotational energy, specifically focusing on determining the maximum height reached by the ball after leaving the ramp.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial energy of the ball, questioning whether it should be expressed as mgh or mg(h+x). There are attempts to relate the rotational motion of the ball to its linear motion and to clarify the role of the ramp's angle. Some participants suggest equating potential energy to kinetic and rotational energy to find a relationship between the maximum height and the initial height.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the energy transformations involved. Some have offered insights into the relationship between linear and rotational motion, while others are still grappling with the implications of their assumptions and the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the introduction of the variable x and whether the angle of the ramp is necessary for solving the problem. Participants are also considering the implications of rolling without slipping and how that affects the energy equations.

bazookajason
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball of mass M and radius R has a moment of inertia of I =2/5MR. The ball is released from rest and rolls
down the ramp with no frictional loss of energy. The ball is projected vertically upward o a ramp as shown in
the diagram, reaching a maximum height ymax above the point where it leaves the ramp. Determine the maximum
height of the projectile ymax in terms of h
2rwrmud.png


The image is cut off but h is the height from the top of the ramp to the ball

Homework Equations


PE=1/2mv^2
Rotational KE= 1/2 I omega^2
KE= 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Using x as the distance between the bottom and top of the ramp:
mg(h+x) = 1/2mv^2+1/2I omega^2 =1/2mv^2 + 1/2(2/5mr^2)omega^2 = 1/2mv^2 + 1/5mv^2 = 7/10mv^2

7/10mv^2=mgx + 1/2mv'^2

1/2mv'^2 = ymax

im stuck here D: any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay so physically the ball rolls down and then exits the ramp spinning and going upward a certain height.

It's energy initially is mgh right? And it's energy afterward will be in the spin and in its motion so if you can determine its rotational energy and subtract it from the mgh you'd have a new mgh right from which to get the final height.

Does that sound right?
 
its energy initally should be mg(h+x), because mgh is just the energy from the top of the ramp to the inital position of the ball
 
I'm not sure why you introduced an x. It rolls from an initial vertical height h, and rises to a height ymax.
 
Don't you need an equation to relate the omega to the ball rolling down with no friction and no slipping? Also do you need the angle of the ramp or does that fall out somewhere? If not I suppose you could choose say 60 degrees or better yet use a variable for it.
 
The clue that is the key to problems like this is to recognize that, by descending without slippage, the rotational speed of the ball is directly related to its linear velocity. When you think about it, it seems obvious, though it may still help if it's spelled out: the ball rotates once in the same time that it rolls a distance 2 Pi R metres.

While you may think the angle of the ramp is needed, it seems not. During the descent, the gravitational potential energy of the ball is totally converted into linear and rotational energy.
 
Sure, however, that still leaves many unknowns. Including the velocity at the bottom and the max y.
 
By equating PE at start to KE + rotational energy on the level, I was able to then obtain a direct proportionality between ymax and h. Recognize that as it rises, the KE is converted into PE while the rotational energy remains as rotational energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K