Conservation of Energy Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a conservation of energy problem involving a spring and friction. Participants utilized the equations for work done by friction, spring potential energy, and kinetic energy to derive answers for multiple parts of the problem. The key equations discussed include ##W_{friction}=W_{fr}=Δ(ME)## and ##U_{spring}=U_s=\frac 1 2kx^2##. The final answers for parts (b) and (c) were determined to be approximately 0.9m and 2.8m, respectively, while part (d) raised questions about the total distance moved, with answers varying between 14.8m and 15m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles
  • Familiarity with spring potential energy calculations
  • Knowledge of work-energy theorem
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about the dynamics of springs and Hooke's Law
  • Explore advanced topics in friction and energy dissipation
  • Practice solving conservation of energy problems with varying conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy conservation, as well as educators seeking to enhance their teaching methods in these topics.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


there's a pic.
Q63.png

Homework Equations


##W_{friction}=W_{fr}=Δ(ME)##
##U_{spring}=U_s=\frac 1 2kx^2##


The Attempt at a Solution


I found (a) using ##W_{fr}=Δ(ME)## which ##v=7,4 \frac m s##
For (b) I wrote;##\frac 1 2kx^2-\frac 1 2mv^2=W_{fr}##
##\frac 1 2kx^2-\frac 1 2mv^2=-F_{fr}x## (here x are the same and represents the comprassion distance)
so we get quadratic equation.
I found ##\frac 1 2mv^2=48988J##
so ##75000x^2+4400x-48988=0##
I solved it but didnt came the answer where did I go wrong ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you get for an answer? And what is the right answer?
 
I found 77 cm answer says 90 cm
 
Sorry, it took me so long to get back. I was off doing something else. I got 0.78 m (or 78 cm) for my answer.
 
TomHart said:
Sorry, it took me so long to get back. I was off doing something else. I got 0.78 m (or 78 cm) for my answer.

then we get same results so there must be some roundings during the process...so I am correct I guess thank you
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TomHart
I solved (c) but (d) is hard.Can someone help me ?
 
Arman777 said:
##\frac 1 2kx^2-\frac 1 2mv^2=-F_{fr}x## (here x are the same and represents the comprassion distance)
Did hitting the spring turn off gravity?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TomHart
haruspex said:
Did hitting the spring turn off gravity?
Yeah...you are right.I didnt see that
 
Arman777 said:
Yeah...you are right.I didnt see that
Me either.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Did hitting the spring turn off gravity?

I found 0.93m when I did it.

I found also (c) correctly with an exact result.

Still having problem with (d)
 
  • #11
Arman777 said:
I found 0.93m when I did it.
Hmm... I think I got .90m.
Arman777 said:
Still having problem with (d)
d) seems a bit strange to me. Haven't you already worked out all the distances moved in b) and c)? Should just be a matter of adding them up. It feels like it is hinting at a shortcut to get this answer without using the intermediate ones, but I don't think there is one.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Hmm... I think I got .90m.

d) seems a bit strange to me. Haven't you already worked out all the distances moved in b) and c)? Should just be a matter of adding them up. It feels like it is hinting at a shortcut to get this answer without using the intermediate ones, but I don't think there is one.

0.93 is approxemetly 0.90 I don't mind so much.

The answer is 15m for (d).

(b) is 0.9m and (c) is 2.8m
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
Hmm... I think I got .90m.

d) seems a bit strange to me. Haven't you already worked out all the distances moved in b) and c)? Should just be a matter of adding them up. It feels like it is hinting at a shortcut to get this answer without using the intermediate ones, but I don't think there is one.
Consider the initial position and the eventual final (resting) position of the cab. The total energy input and eventually dissipated is determined by these points...
 
  • #14
I guess I see...Last energy of our system is 47628J And he took 2.8m+0.9m=3.7m till now.He will go up and down until loses all energy which is 47628J.
 
  • #15
gneill said:
Consider the initial position and the eventual final (resting) position of the cab. The total energy input and eventually dissipated is determined by these points...
How silly of me.
 
  • #16
Then ;
##mgd-0=F_{fr}D##

here D comes 14.8m ?? I it this the answer
 
  • #17
What are you using for the value of d? Are you including the displacement of the elevator to reach the equilibrium point?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: haruspex
  • #18
TomHart said:
What are you using for the value of d? Are you including the displacement of the elevator to reach the equilibrium point?

d is in the given part.3.7 m.The block will stop there
 
  • #19
Will it?
Disclaimer: I have been wrong so many times that I question my own judgment. :)
 
  • #20
TomHart said:
Will it?
Disclaimer: I have been wrong so many times that I question my own judgment. :)

I think that way cause.That seems logical to me..lets wait for another opinion
 
  • #21
Won't the spring end up compressed some because of the weight of the elevator when it finally comes to rest? The problem states that there is no friction when it comes to rest, so something has to be supporting the weight of the elevator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #22
Arman777 said:
I think that way cause.That seems logical to me..lets wait for another opinion
Opinion is worth much less than calculation. What is the restoring force for a spring at its natural length? Will it hold up the cab?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #23
Yep I totally forget that.Ok thanks all of you
 
  • #24
Arman777 said:
I think that way cause.That seems logical to me..lets wait for another opinion
Tom is right. Consider the forces on the cab when it has stopped.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
938
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
701
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K