Conservation of linear momentum.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an impact problem involving a bullet striking a block and becoming embedded in it. The context includes considerations of conservation of linear momentum and the effects of friction on the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether friction can be ignored during the impact phase, suggesting it may be a non-impulsive force. They express uncertainty about how to proceed with the problem, particularly regarding the use of time and acceleration. Other participants discuss the limitations of applying conservation of momentum throughout the entire problem and clarify the role of friction after the initial impact.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the application of conservation of momentum and the effects of friction. Some guidance has been offered on how to approach the problem after the impact, with suggestions to consider constant acceleration due to friction.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions related to forces acting on the block post-impact, particularly the nature of friction and its constancy. The original poster references previous problems for context, indicating a potential gap in understanding how to apply concepts consistently across different scenarios.

whynot314
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
say a bullet with mass mb and initial speed v0 strikes and becomes embedded in a block of mass mc, which is initially at rest. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the bock and the surface is uk. ( a situation I set up)

my question is, because its an impact problem. Can I ignore the friction force over time and use the conservation of linear momentum. because I can assume it is a non impulsive force in this situation?
Ive done some other problems similar to this where there is a constant force, and it is included. So I figure I can remove it when it is an impact.

G1+\int^{t2}_{t1}\SigmaFdt=G2

here is the Problem
[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20140207_224649_zps5b1d47a5.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20140207_224649_zps5b1d47a5.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]

my work. I am unsure about how to go from here, If I solve for V. I can't really use vdv=ads because I can't assume constant acceleration. And the solution does not have time in it. but this is impulse/momentum equation. So I am not to sure.

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20140207_225157_zpse4356e4f.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20140207_225157_zpse4356e4f.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite sure what you mean by "and it is included", but you can't use conservation of momentum for the whole problem. You can to find the initial velocity of the block, but after that friction takes momentum out of the system, so you can't use it for that part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
by included i mean that, I use the equation that is written with the friction force integrated with respect to time.
 
Oh, I see, using impulse. Introducing time into the problem makes it too cumbersome -- you would have to create a second equation with time in order to eliminate it. And you can assume constant acceleration, since when the block is moving, the only force acting along the axis of motion is friction, which is constant. Since you have the initial velocity of the plug, try now finding the initial velocity of both masses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
ok, so I take it that means IMMEDIATELY after impact thus.

v=\frac{Ma\sqrt{2gr}}{(Ma+Mc)}
 
Yes, that looks right. Then it travels a certain distance with a constant frictional force, so you can use those kinematic equations for constant acceleration to solve the rest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ahhh ok thank you, I thought I could only assume constant acceleration if the only force acting was gravity?
 
No problem! And no, it just depends on the case. Gravity works because it is constant (at least roughly), and so does kinetic friction since it is also constant (roughly). It's always a good idea to draw out all your forces in a free-body diagram to see what the case is -- that is, constant or variable net force, for a particular problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K