Conservation of Mechanical Energy Question.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the conservation of mechanical energy in a carnival game scenario with two 20m high bumps. The participant, Marc, calculated the gravitational potential energy of a 5kg ball at the first bump as 980 Joules and equated it to kinetic energy to find the necessary velocity to reach the second bump. He derived a velocity of 28 m/s for the ball to stay at the top of the second bump, concluding that the velocity must lie within the interval (Root(392), 28). The implications of ignoring friction were also discussed, emphasizing that without friction, the ball would theoretically oscillate indefinitely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the conservation of mechanical energy principle
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving energy
  • Knowledge of the effects of friction in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of mechanical energy in closed systems
  • Learn about the effects of friction on energy calculations in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in potential and kinetic energy transformations
  • Investigate real-world applications of energy conservation in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanical energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding energy conservation in practical scenarios.

Azrioch
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
The question goes like something like this:

It is a common carnival scam to set up a game where there are two bumps each being 20mhigh. The goal is to get it to land between the two. You cannot go further than the bottom of the first hill. The bumps are one after another (the teacher did not give us a distance). He also said to ignore friction. He then wanted to know if it was possible to get the ball to land in the middle. The ball is 5kg.

I did not think the implications of their being no friction. After the test it dawned on me that with no friction it would go up and down forever never stopping and wouldn't land in the middle.

Now what I just want to know what I calculated because it made sense at the time and I still don't know. What I did was took the gravitational potential energy from the first bump which was:

Eg = (5)(9.8)(20) which was 980. Then I made Kinetic Energy equal to 980.

So, 980=(1/2)(5)(v)^2

I solved and got Root(392).

Is this the velocity needed to make it stay at the top?

After this I solved for two gravitational potential energies so I got:

1960 =(1/2)(5)(v)^2

I solved this and got 28 m/s.

So I thought this was the energy needed to propel the ball to the second bump and have it stay there. Is that correct or no? If not would you mind telling me why it is not correct?

Anyways my final answer was that the velocity must be in the open interval (Root(392), 28).

Does this make any sense?

Thanks in advance.

- Marc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks.

I overlooked the fact that upon reaching the top the potential energy would still be there and it would be enough to go over the second lump.

Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K