Conservation of mechanical energy ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of mechanical energy using a scenario involving a 0.80 kg coconut falling from a height. The maximum speed of the coconut falling from the tree to the ground is calculated to be 14.0 m/s, based on gravitational potential energy (Ep) of 78.48 J and kinetic energy (Ek) equations. For the coconut falling from the tree to the bottom of a 15-meter cliff, the maximum speed is determined to be 22.14 m/s, with a corrected height of 25 meters factored into the calculations. The participants confirm the calculations and clarify the height used in the second part of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (Ep = mgh)
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations (Ek = (1/2)mv^2)
  • Basic knowledge of units of measurement (meters, kilograms, seconds)
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations to solve for variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between potential and kinetic energy
  • Explore real-world applications of mechanical energy conservation
  • Investigate advanced problems involving energy transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy conservation in real-world scenarios.

XxphysicsxX
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Conservation of mechanical energy ?

A 0.80kg coconut is growing 10m above the ground in its palm tree. The tree is just at the edge of a cliff that is 15 meters tall.

a>What would the maximum speed of the coconut be if it fell to theground beneath the tree?
b>What would the maximum speed be if it fell from the tree to the bottom of the cliff?

Equations:
Ep=mgh
Ek= -Ep
Ek= (1/2)mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution



So I've figured out Ep= 78.48J
However,Im not sure how to relate that to Ek so I could later solve for v?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The second relation you wrote, relates Ek to Ep. Also notice that Ep would be -78.48 J (why?)
 


so for a>
Ep= -78.48J so Ek= 78.48J
Ek= (1/2)(0.80kg)v^2
v= 14.0 m/s

is that right??
 


Yes. For second part, the height changes (to?)
 


for b>
Ep= (.80)(9.81)(25cm)
Ek= 196.2J
196.2/ 0.4 = v^2
v= 22.14m/s
 


That looks good.

Edit : I assumed you meant 25m and not 25 cm.
 


Oops yes, I meant 25m.
Thank you! :)
 


You are welcome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K