B Conservation of momentum in a closed system

AI Thread Summary
In a closed system of particles undergoing elastic collisions, conservation of momentum and kinetic energy suggests that particles will continue to move apart indefinitely. When particles are displaced from the center of mass, their momentum can lead to a scenario where they drift away from each other forever, regardless of their initial conditions. The discussion highlights that even when particles collide, they bounce off each other while conserving momentum and energy, maintaining the outward expansion. Additionally, the analogy to gas behavior indicates that the system must exert pressure if contained, or expand if uncontained. Overall, the principles of classical mechanics imply a continuous outward movement of particles in such a system.
bobdavis
Messages
19
Reaction score
8
In a closed system consisting of a set of particles not at rest relative to each other and acting on each other only by classical mechanical collision (i.e. billiard balls model, not including gravity or other long-range interactions), does conservation of momentum imply that the system will expand outward forever? If so how would I show this and if not can a counterexample be provided?

EDIT: In particular I mean elastic collisions, so not just momentum but also kinetic energy is conserved, and the "not at rest relative to each other" criteria is just non-zero kinetic energy, otherwise a counterexample would be two particles of opposite momentum in inelastic collision such that they both stop.

Attempt at answering: my intuition is that a component of the momentum of the center of mass might at a given time correspond to the kinetic energy of particles that are displaced from the center of mass in the opposite direction as that component, but because momentum and kinetic energy are both conserved, this kinetic energy will eventually propagate in the direction of that component until it reaches the other side, i.e. until its displacement from the center of mass is in the same direction as the component of momentum, and once this is true for all the kinetic energy in the system then you would just have a radially expanding system with particles heading away from the origin forever.

Two examples to clarify:
1) Two particles displaced from the center of mass in the same direction as their momentum: the particles simply drift away from each other forever.
2) Two particles displaced from the center of mass in the opposite direction as their momentum: the particles collide at the center of mass, but kinetic energy and momentum are conserved so the particles bounce off each other and now the situation is the same as (1) and so the particles now drift away from each other forever.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bobdavis said:
In a closed system consisting of a set of particles not at rest relative to each other and acting on each other only by classical mechanical collision (i.e. billiard balls model, not including gravity or other long-range interactions), does conservation of momentum imply that the system will expand outward forever? If so how would I show this and if not can a counterexample be provided?
The system is effectively a gas of particles and must exert some pressure on the walls of any container. If there is no container, then the pressure must gradually decrease and the volume increase. In other words, if the gas has internal KE then it cannot be pressureless.

That's one way to look at it.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and bobdavis
I see. When I posted the question I was just thinking in terms of a regular mechanical system and I didn't make the connection to kinetic theory of gases but now I know where to look for more insight, thank you
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, berkeman and PeroK
If the particles are all identical point particles with equal mass, can this be extended to a stronger statement that the evolution of the system is described by the rays extending from the initial velocity vectors of the particles? i.e. for each particle with initial position p and initial velocity v, at any time t > 0 there will be a particle with position p+vt and velocity v ? ex.. if the particle never collides with any other particles, then this particle will satisfy the criteria at every time t, and if the particle does collide with another particle then second particle will acquire the velocity of the first and traverse the next section with the same velocity v until the next collision and so on (the same as if the particles had just passed through each other without interacting, so the point of collision is just a point of intersection of the trajectory rays)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top