MHB Conservation of Symbols Law of Algebra

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
93
So, I'm trying to think of some way to formulate a "Conservation of Symbols" Law of Mathematics. Something like this:

By "symbol" I mean any atomic variable, constant, digit, operator, bracket, etc., that is present in a syntactically correct expression, equation, or inequality. So the beautiful $e^{i\pi}+1=0$ has precisely 7 symbols: $e, i, \pi, +, 1, =,$ and $0$. The equation $1.25+x=4.67$ has exactly 11 symbols in it: $1, ., 2, 5, +, x, =, 4, ., 6,$ and $7$.

It is unlawful to omit or introduce any symbol or combination of symbols from one line of a derivation to another, unless it is specifically allowed by a valid and relevant mathematical property. That is, symbols are conserved in mathematical derivations.

I'm posting in the algebra forum, because it seems to me that algebra is by far and away the area of mathematics most prone to violations of this rule.

So, my question is this: how could this law be sharpened? Also, how could it be made useful to students? My goal is to help students understand the importance of attention to detail in algebraic manipulations.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It seems to me it's not so much symbols that are conserved, but "units".
Algebraic rules allow merging and conversion of symbols, but their "unit" remains, just like in physics.

For instance $e+2e = 3e$ shows how the symbols are merged, but the $e$ doesn't go away.
It's only through $\pi\ln (3e) = (\ln 3 + 1)\pi$ that $e$ can disappear, but only because the final unit is $\pi$ and does not include $e$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top