Conservative Forces: Internal or Not?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of conservative forces as internal or external forces, particularly in the context of potential energy changes in a system. Participants explore definitions, examples, and implications of conservative and nonconservative forces, as well as their roles in energy transfer and potential energy changes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether conservative forces are always considered internal forces.
  • Gravity is identified as a conservative force, but its classification as internal or external depends on the defined system boundary.
  • There is a discussion about whether nonconservative forces can change an object's potential energy, with examples provided, such as a friction-driven lift mechanism.
  • One participant expresses confusion over a statement suggesting that only conservative forces can increase potential energy, seeking clarification on its validity.
  • Another participant argues that nonconservative forces can also increase potential energy, citing the example of lifting a book, which involves a nonconservative force.
  • A hypothetical scenario involving a puck on an air hockey table is presented to illustrate how conservative forces can affect potential energy in a system.
  • One participant indicates they have gained understanding from the discussion, suggesting that some explanations were helpful.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of forces and their effects on potential energy. There is no consensus on whether only conservative forces can increase potential energy, as some argue for the validity of nonconservative forces in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on definitions of system boundaries and the context in which forces are considered. Unresolved questions remain regarding the implications of different force types on potential energy changes.

Jon Drake
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Are conservative forces always taken as internal forces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity is a conservative force.
 
It's not an internal force, is it?
 
What is internal and what is external depends on how you define your system boundary. Gravity is external for many choices, although it could be internal if you include the whole earth.
 
Can a nonconservative force cause any change in an object's potential energy?
 
Imagine a friction driven lift mechanism. If such a device lifts a load in the gravitational field, it would be changing the potential energy of the object.

What is the point of these questions? Do they relate to anything specific or real?
 
I just read a statement somewhere that only conservative forces can increase the potential energy of a system. So I wanted to clarify my doubt.
 
Anyway, do conservative forces increase the potential energy? Gravitational force pulls the objects towards the Earth's centre, and that only decreases the gravitational potential energy mgh.
 
So, are you now firm in your doubt?
 
  • #10
Yes, and I still cannot understand the logic behind the statement.
 
  • #11
Jon Drake said:
somewhere
Where? It might help if we could see the precise statement and its context.
 
  • #12
Jon Drake said:
Yes, and I still cannot understand the logic behind the statement.
Only conservative forces have a potential energy associated with them. The force acts so as to decrease the potential energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #13
''Where? It might help if we could see the precise statement and its context.''
It actually came as a question :-
Which of the following can increase the P.E. of a system?
a. Conservative Force
b. Nonconservative Force
c. Both
d. None
The answer was (a).
 
  • #14
Jon Drake said:
''Where? It might help if we could see the precise statement and its context.''
It actually came as a question :-
Which of the following can increase the P.E. of a system?
a. Conservative Force
b. Nonconservative Force
c. Both
d. None
The answer was (a).
That answer is plainly incorrect. If I lift a book from the floor and place it on a table, I have increased the potential energy of the book/earth system. But the force of my hand on the book is not conservative.
 
  • #15
Alright, my final question is, can conservative forces in any case increase the P.E. of a system?
 
  • #16
Jon Drake said:
Alright, my final question is, can conservative forces in any case increase the P.E. of a system?
Set a puck at rest in the middle of an air hockey table. Attach a spring between the puck and a point on one end of the table. Attach a second spring between the puck and a point on the opposite end. Draw your system boundaries so that the first spring and the puck are part of the system but the second spring is not.

Set the puck in motion lengthwise along the table and watch it oscillate.

The first spring embodies a conservative force field. So does the second one. The conservative force from the second spring is an external force that is alternately doing work on the system, increasing its energy and extracting work from the system, decreasing its energy. At the halfway point in the oscillation, the puck is neither accelerating nor decelerating. Kinetic energy is unchanging and we have what is undeniably a change in potential energy caused by a conservative force.
 
  • #17
Yes, you are right. I now understand. Thanks for the explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K