Conservative Forces - Maths of Force & Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle of mass m moving along a parabolic path described by the equation y = x^2. The particle is influenced by two external forces: a radial force and a force dependent on the coordinates x and y. Participants are examining whether these forces are conservative and exploring the implications for the particle's speed at the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine the conservativeness of the forces by calculating the curl in polar coordinates and checking the conditions for conservative forces. They also explore the work done by the non-conservative force along the specified path.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of the original poster's results while suggesting a review of the formula for curl in cylindrical coordinates. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical details involved in the problem.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes a focus on the mathematical aspects of force and energy, with participants navigating through the complexities of vector calculus and the implications of their findings on the particle's motion.

geoffrey159
Messages
535
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m moves in a horizontal plane along the parabola ##y = x^2##. At t=0, it is at the point (1,1) with speed v0. Aside from the force of constraint holding it to the path, it is acted upon by the following external forces:
A radial force: ##\vec F_a = -A r^3\hat r##
A force given by : ##\vec F_b = B (y^2\hat \imath - x^2 \hat \jmath)##

where A,B are constants.
a- Are the forces conservative?
b- What is the speed ##v_f## of the particle when it arrives at the origin ?

Homework Equations


curl, integration on a path

The Attempt at a Solution



Hello, I've just started a new chapter about mathematical aspects of force and energy. It's a little hard to digest at the beginning so maybe you can check my work. Thanks !

a - To test whether a force is conservative, I must check that ##\vec \nabla \times \vec F = \vec 0 ##, but I'm going to need an expression of the gradient in polar coordinates for the (x,y) plane. I believe that it is ##\vec \nabla = \frac{\partial .}{\partial r} \hat r + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial .}{\partial \theta} \hat\theta + \frac{\partial .}{\partial z} \hat k## because if ##g = g(r,\theta,z)##, then its differential is

## \begin{array}{ccr}
dg := (\nabla_{\hat r} g)\ dr + (\nabla_{\hat \theta} g)\ ds + (\nabla_{\hat k} g)\ dz
& \text{and} &
\begin{align}
dg =& \frac{\partial g}{\partial r}\ dr + \frac{\partial g}{\partial \theta} \ d\theta
+ \frac{\partial g}{\partial z}\ dz \\
=& \frac{\partial g}{\partial r}\ dr + \frac{\partial g}{\partial \theta} \ (\frac{ds}{r}) + \frac{\partial g}{\partial z}\ dz
\end{align}
\end{array} ##

So if you confirm this is right,

##
\begin{array}{cc}
\vec \nabla \times \vec F_a =
\begin{vmatrix}
\hat r & \hat \theta & \hat k \\
\frac{\partial .}{\partial r} & \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial .}{\partial \theta}& \frac{\partial .}{\partial z} \\
-A r^3 & 0 & 0
\end{vmatrix} = \vec 0
&
\vec \nabla \times \vec F_b =
\begin{vmatrix}
\hat \imath & \hat \jmath & \hat k \\
\frac{\partial .}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial .}{\partial y}& \frac{\partial .}{\partial z} \\
B y^2 & -Bx^2 & 0
\end{vmatrix} = -2B(x+y) \hat k\neq \vec 0
\end{array}
##

So that only the radial force is conservative.b- ##\vec F_b## does a non-conservative work on the path ##y = x^2## from x=1 to x=0, so its work is :
## \begin{align}
W^{(nc)} =& B \int_{(1,1)}^{(0,0)}(y^2 dx - x^2 \ dy) \\
=& - B\int_{0}^{1} (x^4\ dx - x^2 (2x\ dx)) \\
=& \frac{3B}{10}
\end{align}##

The potential fonction of the radial force is ##U_a(\vec r) = \frac{A}{4} r^4##.

By conservation of total energy,

##E_f - E_i =W^{(nc)} \Rightarrow v_f^2 = v_0^2 + \frac{A}{2m} +\frac{3B}{5m}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
up
 
Your result is correct, but check the formula for curl in cylindrical coordinates.
 
Thanks ! I've just checked on the internet, it's the same thing with 1/r factored out of the determinant
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K