Ryder in chapter two of his book says that if we consider parity then it is no longer enough to talk about two spinors and so he introduces 4 spinors. Is there some postulate of Quantum physics that has to do with state trasformation under parity??(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Consider parity then it is no longer enough to talk about two spinors

Loading...

Similar Threads - Consider parity longer | Date |
---|---|

B Questions about parity | Mar 8, 2018 |

I What are the issues with considering state and "state preparation procedure" to be synonymous? | Feb 22, 2018 |

I Will a uniform magnetic field be considered as measurment? | Oct 31, 2017 |

I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables? | Jan 18, 2017 |

Can the wave function be considered a real wave? | Sep 24, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**