1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quantum Consistent Quantum Theory by Griffiths

  1. Strongly Recommend

  2. Lightly Recommend

  3. Lightly don't Recommend

    0 vote(s)
  4. Strongly don't Recommend

    0 vote(s)
  1. Mar 4, 2013 #1
    Last edited: May 6, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 4, 2013 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I am in the middle of reading this text, and have found that it has cleared up a number of conceptual issues for me. The claim is that there is no need to refer to 'wavefunction collapse', and that the claim that quantum mechanics is non-local is based on incorrect reasoning. Since this formalism seems so much more satisfying than the Copenhagen interpretation, I wonder why it isn't more widely taught. What do others think?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted