Consistent Quantum Theory by Griffiths

For those who have used this book

  • Lightly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
Physics news on Phys.org
I am in the middle of reading this text, and have found that it has cleared up a number of conceptual issues for me. The claim is that there is no need to refer to 'wavefunction collapse', and that the claim that quantum mechanics is non-local is based on incorrect reasoning. Since this formalism seems so much more satisfying than the Copenhagen interpretation, I wonder why it isn't more widely taught. What do others think?