I Constancy of the speed of light

  • #51
Thanks for the reference. I can't really comment too much on it since I don't have the time to read it over in detail. It looks like the paper has been cited less than 10 times in the last 7 years though so it seems to have gotten very little traction. That's not a critique of the argument of the paper, but only that it seems it's not well known even within the physics community.
 
Back
Top