Constant-Pressure Calorimetry question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zaqiqu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calorimetry
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a constant-pressure calorimetry problem involving the mixing of 4.00 x 102 mL of 0.600 M HNO3 with 4.00 x 102 mL of 0.300 M Ba(OH)2. The initial temperature is 18.46°C, and the heat of neutralization is given as -56.2 kJ/mol. Participants attempted to calculate the final temperature using the equation q = msΔT, but faced challenges due to significant figure discrepancies and incorrect assumptions about solution density. Ultimately, the correct approach involves calculating moles using n = CV and considering the density of the solutions for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of constant-pressure calorimetry
  • Knowledge of heat of neutralization principles
  • Familiarity with molarity and molar mass calculations
  • Proficiency in using the equation q = msΔT
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of heat of neutralization in detail
  • Learn how to accurately calculate moles using n = CV
  • Research the impact of solution density on calorimetry calculations
  • Explore significant figures and their importance in chemical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone involved in thermodynamics or calorimetry experiments will benefit from this discussion, particularly those tackling similar homework problems in physical chemistry.

Zaqiqu
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A quantity of 4.00 3 10 2 mL of 0.600 M HNO 3 is mixed with 4.00 3 10 2 mL of 0.300 M Ba(OH) 2 in a constant-pressure calorimeter of negligible heat capacity. The initial temperature of both solutions is the same at 18.46°C. What is the final temperature of the solution? (Use the result in Example 6.8 for your calculation.)

The result in example 6.8 is the heat of neutralization = -56.2 kJ/mol, I believe.

2. Homework Equations

q = msDelta-T

The Attempt at a Solution


I've asked almost everybody I know who knows anything about chemistry to give this a shot, but no luck. One got x = 120 (no idea where that came from). I've spent hours working on this problem, and have tried various methods, anything I can think of. Two of my closer shots were:

Taking 6.8's 2810J, I tried writing (with C meaning "degrees Celsius"):

2810J = (400mL + 400mL)(4.184 J/g * C)(x - 18.46C)
2810 = 3347.2x - 61789.312
x = 19.2995 (degrees Celsius).

This is incorrect.

I tried taking the number of moles, determining the masses, then combining those, to write; I continue to assume q = 2810J, as have other people in past forum posts I've found via Google. Not entirely sure what else it could be.):

q = (35.684g)(4.184 J/g * C)(x - 18.46C)
2810J = 149.3x - 2711.288
x = 36.98
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it, but I'm off by .10 from the answer in the book. Gonna do one more iteration, but with more attention paid to significant figures; if I'm closer, I'll post what I got.
 
The balanced equation:

2HNO3 (aq) + Ba(OH)2 (aq) ---> 2H2O (l) + Ba(NO3)2 (aq)

The molar masses:
HNO3 = 63.018g
Ba(NO3)2 = 261.32g
Ba(OH)2 = 171.316g

Since
400mL = 400g
we can write

400g Ba(OH)2 * (1 mole Ba(OH)2 / 171.316g Ba(OH)2) = 2.34 mol Ba(OH)2

Using the heat of neutralization found in the previous problem (-56.2 * 10^3 J), we can determine Qrxn as follows:

2.34 mol Ba(OH)2 * ((5.62 * 10^3 J) / 1 mol Ba(OH)2) = -1.32 * 10^4 J

Thus

Qrxn = -1.32 * 10^4 J

Qrxn = -Qsoln

-1.32 * 10^4 J = - Qsoln

Qsoln = msDelta-T = (400g + 400g)(4.184 J/g * C)(x - 18.46C) = (3347.2x - 6.18*10^4 J)

-1.32 * 10^4 J = - (3347.2x - 6.18 * 10^4 J)

-7.5 * 10^4 J = -3347.2x

x = 22.41

The back of the book gives 22.49.
 
Nothing seems correct here (which is not necessarily your fault).

First of all, without even trying to understand what you did: one can't use an approximate value of 56.2 kJ (three significant digits) and expect an exact answer accurate to 4 significant digits. SD are blatantly wrong in many cases, but sometimes the logic they provide helps see why something is conceptually wrong.

Accuracy of the 1g=1mL assumption is also questionable. As a rule of thumb for diluted solutions it works, but not when you expect 4 SD accuracy. 0.6 M nitric acid has the density of 1.0185 g/mL, which is more than enough to make the difference between 22.41 and 22.49 ridiculous (if you assumed 1g=1mL, you have 2% error in one of the input data, don't expect better accuracy in the final answer).

You are doing many things that I have problems to follow, one I got is quite wrong:

Zaqiqu said:
Since
400mL = 400g
we can write

400g Ba(OH)2 * (1 mole Ba(OH)2 / 171.316g Ba(OH)2) = 2.34 mol Ba(OH)2

No. You don't have 400 g of Ba(OH)2. You have 400 mL of 0.3 M solution. All you need is n=CV, no need for molar masses here.
 
Borek said:
No. You don't have 400 g of Ba(OH)2. You have 400 mL of 0.3 M solution. All you need is n=CV, no need for molar masses here.

This is from the textbook. The associated example from which this problem is a practice exercise said to assume x mL = x g.

I'm completely flummoxed by this problem, as is everybody else I've asked to help. Most of what I did here is derived from the examples immediately preceding this practice exercise (it is from example 6.8 from Chang's Chemistry), as well as from the Instructor's Solution manual's solution for the linked-to problem 6.38 (i.e. after doing practice exercise 6.8, it directs you to problem 6.38 at the end of the chapter). Unfortunately, this solution manual does not give any help for practice exercises, which is why I really have no idea what's right or wrong.
 
x mL = x g is for mass of the SOLUTION. You do understand the difference between SOLUTION and SOLUTE?

If you have 1000 mL of 1 M NaCl solution - how many moles of NaCl is there? Just one (which just follows the definition of molarity), or 1000/58?

Nothing really difficult here, on the contrary - the problem seems quite trivial. Calculate number of moles from n=CV (in general you should do it for both substances and find the limiting reagent, but even without calculations it is obvious they are mixed in the stoichiometric ratio), knowing number of moles of water produced calculate amount of heat produced from the neutralization, then just plug and chug into q=mcΔT (assume density of 1g/mL - that's where the x mL = x g comes into play).

You won't get high accuracy with this approach. For an exact number you would need tabulated data on the solution density and specific heat of the Ba(ON3)2 - good luck finding them (hint: don't even try to waste your time doing it).
 
I can't tell you how satisfying it is to have somebody go on about how wrong you are, only to have it confirmed that you are right. Such an arrogant tone for a homework-help forum, especially from somebody who was dead wrong.
 
My answer was wrong, but I had the right idea. I finally got the proper solution, and it shows that I did make a mistake - should have taken the 0.24 moles, as per the equation n=MV - and which I had written on one of my five pages of notes, but I overlooked in the frustration of spending five hours and two nights working on the problem - rather than taking the 400g and dividing it by the molar mass to get the number of moles as 2.34. Other than that, however, my entire procedure was correct. INCLUDING converting 400mL to 400g.
 
I told you in my very first post - fact that things are wrong is not necessarily your fault. To me it rather looks like the question is poorly formulated, as the accuracy given in the book's answer is impossible to achieve with the data given.

To repeat what I wrote above - converting 400 mL to 400 g is only an approximation. Mass of the 400 mL of 0.6 M nitric acid solution is not 400 g, it is 407.4 g. Finding it requires knowing the density, which in turn requires consulting the density tables, if you have not used them your answer is a bit off.

Besides, please reread your original post - you refer to question 6.8, you quote it as giving

heat of neutralization = -56.2 kJ/mol

and then in your calculations you use a number

Taking 6.8's 2810J,

that seems unrelated (and you never explained where it came from). This is inconsistent and makes it impossible to follow your work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K