Constant solutions to the Lagrange equations of motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a particle moving on the surface of an inverted cone can exhibit constant values for the radial distance \( r \) and angular velocity \( \dot{\phi} \) as solutions to the Lagrange equations of motion. The equations of motion are derived from the Lagrangian, and it is established that setting \( \ddot{r} = 0 \) leads to uniform circular motion, confirming that the system can maintain constant \( r \) and \( \dot{\phi} \) indefinitely under the right initial conditions. The key takeaway is that while the equations allow for constant solutions, they do not inherently lead to them without appropriate initial conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the Lagrange equations of motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of uniform circular motion
  • Knowledge of differentiation in calculus
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics related to motion on curved surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian for systems with constraints
  • Explore the implications of initial conditions on motion in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Learn about the stability of orbits in conservative systems
  • Investigate the role of friction and other forces in modifying motion on surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators and researchers interested in Lagrangian dynamics and motion on curved surfaces.

bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle moves on the surface of an inverted cone. The Lagrangian is given by

t%29%5Cdot%7Br%7D%5E%7B2%7D+r%5E%7B2%7D%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%5Cright%29-mg%5Calpha%20r.png


Show that there is a solution of the equations of motion where
png.latex?r.png
and
png.latex?%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D.png
take constant values
png.latex?r_0.png
and
png.latex?%5COmega.png
respectively

Homework Equations


The equations of motion
png.latex?r.png
and
png.latex?%5Cphi.png
are

tex?%5Cddot%7Br%7D+%5Calpha%5E%7B2%7D%5Cddot%7Br%7D-r%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D%5E%7B2%7D+g%5Calpha%20=0.png
(1)

png.latex?r%5E2%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D=K.png
(2)

So
png.latex?%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D.png
can be eliminated from equation (1)

The Attempt at a Solution


Would I go about this by setting
png.latex?%5Cddot%7Br%7D.png
equal to a constant,
png.latex?r_0.png
, and similarly for
png.latex?%5Cdot%7B%5Cphi%7D.png
?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
bobred said:
Would I go about this by setting
png.png
equal to a constant,
png.png
, and similarly for
png.png
?

It is not \ddot{r}, \dot{\phi} that you were asked to show provide a solution, but {r}, \dot{\phi}. These requirements define uniform circular motion. The question is thus asking you to use the equations to check that uniform circular motion is a solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
MarcusAgrippa said:
It is not \ddot{r}, \dot{\phi} that you were asked to show provide a solution, but {r}, \dot{\phi}. These requirements define uniform circular motion. The question is thus asking you to use the equations to check that uniform circular motion is a solution.

If ##r(t) = r_0## (a constant), what is ##\ddot{r}(t)##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
What do you get when you differentiate a constant?
 
Differentiating a constant is zero.
I was thinking about the equations in isolation to each other and not as part of a system. So

v=r \dot{\phi}=r_0 \Omega

I just need to show that the equations of motion lead to this.
 
Last edited:
bobred said:
Differentiating a constant is zero.
I was thinking about the equations in isolation to each other and not as part of a system. So

v=r \dot{\phi}=r_0 \Omega

I just need to show that the equations of motion lead to this.

No: they do not "lead to" this; they merely allow this.

There is a big difference, since (due to the lack of friction) a solution with non-constant ##r## and ##\dot{\phi}## never settles down to a limiting orbit of constant ##r## and ##\dot{\phi}##. However, if you start off with the correct initial conditions, your orbit maintains constant ##r## and ##\dot{\phi}## forever. Essentially, that is what you are being asked to verify.
 
So setting the acceleration \ddot{r}=0 leaves a constant r and \dot{\phi} which allows the uniform motion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K