Lagrange equation particle on an inverted cone

bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive the equations of motion and show that the equation of motion for [itex]\phi[/itex] implies that [itex]r^2\dot{\phi}=K[/itex] where [itex]K[/itex] is a constant

Homework Equations


Using cylindrical coordinates and [itex]z=\alpha r[/itex]
The kinetic and potential energies are
[tex]T=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right][/tex] and
[tex]V=mg\alpha r[/tex]
The Lagrangian is
[tex]L\left(r,\dot{r},\dot{\phi}\right)=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right]-mg\alpha r[/tex]
The equation of motion is
[tex]\dfrac{d}{d t}\left(\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{\mathbf{q}_{k}}}\right)-\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\mathbf{q}_{k}}=0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


The equation of motion for [itex]r[/itex]
[tex]\ddot{r}+\alpha^{2}\ddot{r}-r\dot{\phi}^{2}+g\alpha =0[/tex]
The equation of motion for [itex]\phi[/itex]
[tex]r^{2}\dot{\phi}-r^{2}\ddot{\phi} =0[/tex]
Is this correct? If so how does it imply that [itex]r^2\dot{\phi}=K[/itex] is a constant?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobred said:

Homework Statement


Derive the equations of motion and show that the equation of motion for [itex]\phi[/itex] implies that [itex]r^2\dot{\phi}=K[/itex] where [itex]K[/itex] is a constant

Homework Equations


Using cylindrical coordinates and [itex]z=\alpha r[/itex]
The kinetic and potential energies are
[tex]T=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right][/tex] and
[tex]V=mg\alpha r[/tex]
The Lagrangian is
[tex]L\left(r,\dot{r},\dot{\phi}\right)=\dfrac{m}{2}\left[\left(1+\alpha^{2}\right)\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}\right]-mg\alpha r[/tex]
The equation of motion is
[tex]\dfrac{d}{d t}\left(\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{\mathbf{q}_{k}}}\right)-\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial\mathbf{q}_{k}}=0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


The equation of motion for [itex]r[/itex]
[tex]\ddot{r}+\alpha^{2}\ddot{r}-r\dot{\phi}^{2}+g\alpha =0[/tex]
The equation of motion for [itex]\phi[/itex]
[tex]r^{2}\dot{\phi}-r^{2}\ddot{\phi} =0[/tex]
Is this correct? If so how does it imply that [itex]r^2\dot{\phi}=K[/itex] is a constant?
Thanks

Your ##\phi##-equation is incorrect:
$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = m r^2 \dot{\phi},$$
so
$$\frac{d}{dt} (m r^2 \dot{\phi}) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} = 0 .$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bobred
Hi, got it thanks. Integrating the left hand side gives
[tex]r^2\dot{\phi}=K[/tex]
Meaning I can eliminate [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex] from the equation of motion for [itex]r[/itex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K