Particle confined to move on the surface of sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving Lagrange's equations of motion for a particle constrained to move on the surface of an expanding sphere. The original poster presents their attempt at formulating the Lagrangian and expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their position coordinates and approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of generalized coordinates, specifically ##\theta## and ##\phi##, and the need to express the Lagrangian in terms of these coordinates. There are inquiries about the variation of ##\phi## and the correctness of the position coordinates given the expanding radius.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's approach while suggesting further exploration of the equations of motion for both coordinates. There is acknowledgment that the initial formulation may be on the right track, but more work is needed to clarify the relationships and expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific form of the radius as a function of time, R(t) = R + R0e^at, and discuss the implications of this on the motion of the particle.

kimpossible
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


what will be Lagrange,s equation of motion for a particle confined to move on surface of sphere whose radius is expanding such that

Homework Equations


Euler-lagranges equation of motion
d/dt(∂L/∂{dq/dt})-∂L/∂q=0

The Attempt at a Solution


Z=(R+R0e^at)cosθ
X=(R+R0e^at)sinθcosΦ
Y=(R+R0e^at)sinθsinΦ
Lagrangian L=T-U
T=1/2(mv^2)=1/2m{(dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2+(dz/dt)^2}
and
U=mgz
I just want to know whether I'm going on right track or not? and are the position coordinates right? Is the answer goes with the spherical pendulum?
 

Attachments

  • hamiltonian.jpg
    hamiltonian.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 714
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Kim, :welcome:

I see nothing wrong with your approach. I take it you choose ##\theta## and ##\phi## as generalized coordinates.
For ##R_0 = 0## you have the spherical pendulum case, so it's good to check with those expressions.
 
kimpossible said:

Homework Statement


what will be Lagrange,s equation of motion for a particle confined to move on surface of sphere whose radius is expanding such that

Homework Equations


Euler-lagranges equation of motion
d/dt(∂L/∂{dq/dt})-∂L/∂q=0

The Attempt at a Solution


Z=(R+R0e^at)cosθ
X=(R+R0e^at)sinθcosΦ
Y=(R+R0e^at)sinθsinΦ
Lagrangian L=T-U
T=1/2(mv^2)=1/2m{(dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2+(dz/dt)^2}
and
U=mgz
I just want to know whether I'm going on right track or not? and are the position coordinates right? Is the answer goes with the spherical pendulum?

Are your "generalized coordinates" ##q## just ##\theta## and ##\phi##? If so, you need to express the Lagrangian in terms of them, so you need to figure out ##v^2## and ##U## in terms of ##\theta, \phi, \dot{\theta}, \dot{\phi}##.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Are your "generalized coordinates" ##q## just ##\theta## and ##\phi##? If so, you need to express the Lagrangian in terms of them, so you need to figure out ##v^2## and ##U## in terms of ##\theta, \phi, \dot{\theta}, \dot{\phi}##.
yeah i expressed v and U in terms of generalized coordinates, but I'm not sure if Φ varies (i mean equation of motion for Φ)
 
and let me correct the problem-particle confined to move on the surface of sphere whose radius is expanding such a that R(t)=R+R0e^at
 
kimpossible said:
yeah i expressed v and U in terms of generalized coordinates, but I'm not sure if Φ varies (i mean equation of motion for Φ)

In general there is no a priori reason to assume anything about ##\phi##. There are two Lagrange differential equations, one for ##\theta## and one for ##\phi##. Write them down and see what they tell you.
 
Ray Vickson said:
In general there is no a priori reason to assume anything about ##\phi##. There are two Lagrange differential equations, one for ##\theta## and one for ##\phi##. Write them down and see what they tell you.
thanks for your view but are my x,y,z coordinates are correct if radius R is expanding such a that R(t)=R0e^at where t is time and a,R0 are constants? Was my approach correct as i described in- The attempt at a solution
 
kimpossible said:
thanks for your view but are my x,y,z coordinates are correct if radius R is expanding such a that R(t)=R0e^at where t is time and a,R0 are constants? Was my approach correct as i described in- The attempt at a solution

It looks like the very beginning of a possibly correct approach, but is far from finished.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K