Constant Velocity Motion In Train Car

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of constant velocity motion as illustrated by a thought experiment involving a person in a train car. Participants explore whether it is possible to determine motion when isolated from external stimuli, particularly in the context of special relativity and potential experiments involving sub-atomic particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the scenario of a person in a train car is purely a thought experiment or if it has real-world implications, particularly regarding the measurement of sub-atomic particles like neutrinos.
  • Another participant clarifies that the phrase "windows drawn" implies isolation from external stimuli, which is crucial for the thought experiment.
  • A different participant raises the issue of distinguishing between the motion of the particle and the motion of the train, suggesting that without a reference point, it is impossible to determine motion definitively.
  • This participant also notes that any experiment to deduce motion would require a reference point, and presents a hypothetical scenario of an object in empty space to illustrate the ambiguity of motion.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their understanding and acknowledges the complexity of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the thought experiment to real-world scenarios, with some emphasizing the theoretical nature of the discussion while others explore practical implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the ability to determine motion without external references.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of the thought experiment, particularly the dependence on external reference points and the challenges of measuring motion in isolation.

mjacobsca
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
One of the scenarios that I've come across while reading about special relativity is the scenario of a person riding on a train undergoing constant velocity motion, such that the person in a train car with all windows drawn is unaware that their train car is moving at all. The car is not accelerating, there are no bumps in the road. The suggestion is that the person in the car cannot perform any experiment that allows them to determine whether they are undergoing motion or not.

My question is whether this is a thought experiment, or whether it holds true in reality? If a person could measure sub-atomic particles like neutrinos, wouldn't they be able to conduct an experiment that determines their motion? Some particles travel through the train compartment's walls. So we should be able to determine motion relative to those, right?

Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the experiment says "windows drawn" it really means that the train is isolated from all outside stimulus.
 
How do you tell if it's the particle moving or the train moving? Assuming you are just sitting their with with no other reference point how can you know?

How could you conduct an experiment to deduct that? I also think that example wasn't meant to be seen so rigorously. Yeah you could use a particle to say that either or condition is true, knowing that trains travel a specific speed relative to the Earth or the ground, you can deduct that way, but if there is no other reference, you will always get stuck at having to refer to another point to compare. Imagine a single object in empty space moving at constant velocity, Is it moving or stationary?

At least that what I got from my readings...I could be totally wrong and make a fool out of myself.
 
There is no easy way to do anything that is difficult. Someone can not teach a fast way around, putting in the time
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K