Q: Inertial Frames & Detecting Motion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mjacobsca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames Inertial
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Inertial frames, as defined by Newton's Laws of Motion, cannot be distinguished from motion within a closed system, such as a train compartment. The discussion highlights that even with hypothetical detectors like neutrino or Higgs detectors, the fundamental principles of relativity and motion remain intact. These particles do not share a common rest frame, and their behavior is consistent regardless of the train's motion. Therefore, the laws of physics apply uniformly across all inertial frames, affirming the core tenets of special relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with the principles of special relativity
  • Knowledge of particle physics, specifically neutrinos and Higgs bosons
  • Concept of inertial frames in classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Higgs boson detection on relativistic physics
  • Explore the behavior of neutrinos in different inertial frames
  • Study the concept of space-time foam and its theoretical implications
  • Investigate the relationship between motion and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR)
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of motion and relativity in the context of particle physics.

mjacobsca
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
In a true inertial frame inside a train compartment, it is impossible to do an experiment that can tell you if you are moving or not. This is a key consequence of Newton's Laws Of Motion. However, if someone had a neutrino detector, or a Higgs detector (assuming they exist), wouldn't it be impossible to have a pure inertial frame of reference, ever, since we could always determine motion? Would this have any ramifications for special relativity or Newton's Laws Of Motion? Or, as I expect, does the train car analogy assume that nothing, not even a hypothetical bit of space-time foamy quantization, could be detected from inside the train car?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mjacobsca said:
In a true inertial frame inside a train compartment, it is impossible to do an experiment that can tell you if you are moving or not. This is a key consequence of Newton's Laws Of Motion. However, if someone had a neutrino detector, or a Higgs detector (assuming they exist), wouldn't it be impossible to have a pure inertial frame of reference, ever, since we could always determine motion? Would this have any ramifications for special relativity or Newton's Laws Of Motion? Or, as I expect, does the train car analogy assume that nothing, not even a hypothetical bit of space-time foamy quantization, could be detected from inside the train car?
Higgs particles and neutrinos do not all have a common rest frame (nor is the space-time foam expected to), if these particles were created during the course of the experiment by the lab apparatus then they should behave the same (on average) regardless of the train's state of motion. If you're talking about cosmological neutrinos, the principle of relativity just says the laws of physics work the same way in all frames, so if you start with the same initial conditions of particles in a train, they will behave (on average) the same way subsequently regardless of the state of motion. Cosmological neutrinos coming from the outside might look different depending on the train's speed relative to the CMBR, but this doesn't change the fact about the laws of physics being the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K