Quantum Constructing Quantum Mechanics by Duncan

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Duncan's books "Constructing Quantum Mechanics," which explore the historical and conceptual development of quantum mechanics rather than serving as traditional textbooks. Participants note that while the first volume can be challenging due to its historical context, it is well-written and rated highly, around 4 out of 5. Readers emphasize the importance of having a foundational understanding of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory to fully appreciate these works. Comparisons are made to other texts, indicating that Duncan's books maintain a technical level akin to proper textbooks. Overall, the books are recognized for their unique approach to a well-explored subject.
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice find, I also wonder what it brings new in a topic well covered over the years.
 
@weirdoguy
Any comments? You mentioned the first volume a couple of years ago.
 
Ah, yes. I would rank it as 4 out of 5. Sometimes it's a tough read because of the way some topics were historically developed. Some of the authors summaries (as I remember, first chapter or two, are summaries of the whole book) are also a tough read, but I guess that's because it's hard to summary the chaos that was happening 😆
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Frabjous and Demystifier
Frabjous said:
Anyone read these books and care to share their thoughts?

https://www.amazon.com/Constructing...ld-1900-1923/dp/0198845472/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/Constructing...ch-1923-1927/dp/0198883900/?tag=pfamazon01-20
I haven't read them (yet), but they are at the top of my list. However, I have read this one:
https://www.amazon.com/Conceptual-Framework-Quantum-Field-Theory/dp/0199573263?tag=pfamazon01-20

and in a way the books you mention above are the prequels to it. They are not typical textbooks on either QM or QFT, but rather aim at showing their historical as well as the conceptual development. Hence, in order to understand and gain from these books, you should at least have a working knowledge of QM and QFT respectively.

All three books are excellently written, and I would give them also at least 4 out of 5, just as "weirdoguy",
 
This one I own too, but I haven't read it yet. I would say it is comparable in style and content.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Muu9 said:
Is it more technical than this?

I don't know that book, but Duncans one is technical, at a level of a proper textbook.
 

Similar threads

Engineering Need Advice on Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics Textbook
Replies
2
Views
2K
High Energy What is the level of Aitchison & Hey's QFT books?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Quantum Is "Quantum Physics for Dummies" a good textbook for starting QP?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Quantum Have You Read The World According to Quantum Mechanics?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Engineering History of Metallurgy: Smil & Smith Books
Replies
3
Views
2K
Intro Physics Weinberg, Foundations of Modern Physics (2021)
Replies
6
Views
2K
Quantum Clifford Algebra for Quantum Field Theory, Supersymmetry, Supergravity
Replies
3
Views
3K
Classical The Statistical Foundations of Entropy by Ramshaw
Replies
1
Views
1K
Classical What Are the Best Resources for Learning Electrodynamics?
Replies
21
Views
4K
Other Learning Real Analysis at My Own Pace
Replies
34
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top