Learning Real Analysis at My Own Pace

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on self-directed learning in real analysis and advanced mathematics, specifically using texts such as "Understanding Analysis" by Abbott and "Spivak's Calculus." Participants emphasize the importance of balancing rigor with intuitive understanding and recommend various books, including "Naive Set Theory" by Halmos and "What is Mathematics?" by Courant. The conversation also highlights the need for a structured approach to learning, suggesting that learners identify specific topics and prerequisites to guide their studies effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real analysis concepts, particularly from "Understanding Analysis" by Abbott.
  • Familiarity with calculus, especially computational calculus and Spivak's approach.
  • Basic knowledge of complex analysis, as it relates to elliptic and hyper-elliptic functions.
  • Access to academic resources, such as university or engineering college libraries.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Understanding Analysis" by Abbott for foundational real analysis concepts.
  • Explore "Spivak's Calculus" for a rigorous approach to calculus.
  • Study complex analysis to prepare for advanced topics like elliptic functions.
  • Investigate the prerequisites for studying differential geometry and analytical mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for high school students, aspiring mathematicians, and anyone interested in self-studying advanced mathematics and physics concepts, particularly those looking to balance rigor with intuitive understanding.

  • #31
Mr.Husky said:
Can anyone answer my question? I have knowledge roughly of a freshman.
How far have you read into Klein/Sommerfeld?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
caz said:
How far have you read into Klein/Sommerfeld?
Nothing. Stopped after hearing elliptic functions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #33
Mr.Husky said:
Nothing. Stopped after hearing elliptic functions.
Exactly. You stopped at Chapter 0. You are not ready for it.

You have a freshman’s knowledge, but do not want to pursue intermediate classical, qm or em, although you might look at Susskind’s theoetical minimum books and lectures.
For classical, I would suggest looking at thermodynamics, waves, optics, fluid dynamics or relativity. If you are set on rigid bodies, pick up an engineering book on the subject.
For quantum, I would suggest starting with a “modern physics” book.
There is always Feynman.
Theoretical Concepts in Physics by Longair.
Dimensional Analysis by Bridgman
Gravity by Schutz
Nonlinear dynamics and chaos by Strogatz
Physics of the Earth by Stacey
An astronomy book
An Introduction to Error Analysis by Taylor
 
Last edited:
  • #34
You show extremely good taste in books. However the ones you have listed already would require years of study for most people. So instead of suggesting more, I recommend that you actually dive into some of the ones you already have, e.g. Spivak, and Hilbert-Cohn Vossen. You will be well repaid for the time spent reading them in depth and working as many exercises as possible.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr.Husky, berkeman, vanhees71 and 2 others
  • #35
Thanks @caz and @mathwonk for your suggestions. I will keep them in mind. Thanks everyone here for helping me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K