Other Learning Real Analysis at My Own Pace

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around an individual who is studying real analysis and seeking a balanced approach to mathematics that combines rigor with intuition. They express frustration with the pace of learning and the overwhelming number of topics they wish to cover, including elliptic functions and dynamics of rigid bodies. Participants suggest focusing on foundational subjects and recommend specific books, while also highlighting the importance of a structured learning path. The conversation emphasizes the need for a solid understanding of prerequisites before tackling advanced topics. Overall, the thread underscores the challenges of self-directed learning in mathematics and the importance of a well-organized study plan.
  • #31
Mr.Husky said:
Can anyone answer my question? I have knowledge roughly of a freshman.
How far have you read into Klein/Sommerfeld?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
caz said:
How far have you read into Klein/Sommerfeld?
Nothing. Stopped after hearing elliptic functions.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #33
Mr.Husky said:
Nothing. Stopped after hearing elliptic functions.
Exactly. You stopped at Chapter 0. You are not ready for it.

You have a freshman’s knowledge, but do not want to pursue intermediate classical, qm or em, although you might look at Susskind’s theoetical minimum books and lectures.
For classical, I would suggest looking at thermodynamics, waves, optics, fluid dynamics or relativity. If you are set on rigid bodies, pick up an engineering book on the subject.
For quantum, I would suggest starting with a “modern physics” book.
There is always Feynman.
Theoretical Concepts in Physics by Longair.
Dimensional Analysis by Bridgman
Gravity by Schutz
Nonlinear dynamics and chaos by Strogatz
Physics of the Earth by Stacey
An astronomy book
An Introduction to Error Analysis by Taylor
 
Last edited:
  • #34
You show extremely good taste in books. However the ones you have listed already would require years of study for most people. So instead of suggesting more, I recommend that you actually dive into some of the ones you already have, e.g. Spivak, and Hilbert-Cohn Vossen. You will be well repaid for the time spent reading them in depth and working as many exercises as possible.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Mr.Husky, berkeman, vanhees71 and 2 others
  • #35
Thanks @caz and @mathwonk for your suggestions. I will keep them in mind. Thanks everyone here for helping me.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K