Constructing Quantum Mechanics by Duncan

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the books "Constructing Quantum Mechanics" by Duncan, focusing on their historical and conceptual development of quantum mechanics (QM) and quantum field theory (QFT). Participants share their thoughts on the content, readability, and technicality of these works.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the new insights these books might offer, given the extensive coverage of the topic over the years.
  • One participant rates the first volume as 4 out of 5, noting that it can be a tough read due to the historical development of topics.
  • Another participant mentions that the books are not typical textbooks but aim to illustrate the historical and conceptual evolution of QM and QFT, requiring prior knowledge of these subjects.
  • There is a suggestion that the books are excellently written, with a similar rating of 4 out of 5 from another participant.
  • Questions arise regarding the technicality of Duncan's books in comparison to other works, with one participant asserting that Duncan's book is technical and comparable to a proper textbook.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the quality of the books, rating them similarly, but there is no consensus on their technicality compared to other texts, indicating a range of perspectives on the subject.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the summaries in the books may reflect the chaotic historical context of quantum mechanics, which could affect readability.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the historical and conceptual development of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as those looking for advanced technical discussions on these topics.

Physics news on Phys.org
Nice find, I also wonder what it brings new in a topic well covered over the years.
 
@weirdoguy
Any comments? You mentioned the first volume a couple of years ago.
 
Ah, yes. I would rank it as 4 out of 5. Sometimes it's a tough read because of the way some topics were historically developed. Some of the authors summaries (as I remember, first chapter or two, are summaries of the whole book) are also a tough read, but I guess that's because it's hard to summary the chaos that was happening 😆
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous and Demystifier
Frabjous said:
I haven't read them (yet), but they are at the top of my list. However, I have read this one:
https://www.amazon.com/Conceptual-Framework-Quantum-Field-Theory/dp/0199573263?tag=pfamazon01-20

and in a way the books you mention above are the prequels to it. They are not typical textbooks on either QM or QFT, but rather aim at showing their historical as well as the conceptual development. Hence, in order to understand and gain from these books, you should at least have a working knowledge of QM and QFT respectively.

All three books are excellently written, and I would give them also at least 4 out of 5, just as "weirdoguy",
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
This one I own too, but I haven't read it yet. I would say it is comparable in style and content.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
Muu9 said:
Is it more technical than this?

I don't know that book, but Duncans one is technical, at a level of a proper textbook.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K