Contact Angle of Immiscible Liquids in a Tube

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of contact angles between immiscible liquids in a cylindrical tube. Participants explore the challenges and methodologies associated with accurately determining these angles, particularly in the context of static measurements and the influence of scale on observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in finding reliable sources for measuring contact angles of immiscible liquids in a tube.
  • Another participant questions whether the focus should be on contact angle or interfacial energy, highlighting the complexity of measuring contact angles due to factors like advancing/retreating angles and scale differences.
  • A participant clarifies their interest in static contact angles, emphasizing the need for a reliable, repeatable method rather than homemade approaches.
  • Concerns are raised about the optical measurement challenges in cylindrical tubes, particularly regarding lensing effects.
  • A suggestion is made to use a square or rectangular cuvette with flat windows to mitigate imaging difficulties when measuring contact angles.
  • References to established literature, including works by Dussan and Adamson, are provided as potential sources for measurement methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a specific method for measuring contact angles, and multiple viewpoints regarding the challenges and approaches remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations related to the equipment available for measuring contact angles and the variability of contact angles with magnification, as well as the distinction between static and dynamic measurements.

AqibH
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble finding any sources which describe how to accurately measure the contact angle between immiscible liquids in a tube. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AqibH said:
I'm having trouble finding any sources which describe how to accurately measure the contact angle between immiscible liquids in a tube.

There is a lot of information out there, but it may appear confusing for a variety of reasons. Are you actually interested in the contact angle, or are you actually trying to measure the interfacial energy? What information have you found so far?

What do you mean by 'accurately'? In many situations, the contact angle is not a unique angle (advancing/retreating angles and canthotaxis, for example). Additionally, the contact angle at microscopic length scales is not necessarily the same as the contact angle at macroscopic length scales (among others, E. B. Dussan V.'s work is the gold-standard on this question). Finally, is this a static or dynamic (wetting) measurement?

Is your tube cylindrical? optical measurements are then subject to lensing and related difficulties.
 
I am interested in the contact angle itself as I already have measured the interfacial tension (but not in the same cylindrical tube). I have not been able to find any information on measuring the contact angle of immiscible liquids inside a tube. It seems all the focus of measuring contact angles has been for liquid-vapor-solid interfaces on a flat plane or in a tube.

By 'accurately', I meant a method which was reliable and not some kind of homemade method which I have seen some papers use. I am only interested in the static contact angle as I understand that measuring dynamic contact angles can be difficult. I also understand that the more you zoom on an image the contact angle will change. Basically, I was hoping that there existed some method which is used to measure the angle and it was a method which could be consistently repeatable.

The tube is cylindrical. I understand the issues of optical measurements but this is what I am leaning towards. We don't really have the equipment to measure contact angle of even one liquid in a tube (there are published methods for this liquid-vapor-solid interface).
 
AqibH said:
I am interested in the contact angle itself as I already have measured the interfacial tension (but not in the same cylindrical tube). I have not been able to find any information on measuring the contact angle of immiscible liquids inside a tube. It seems all the focus of measuring contact angles has been for liquid-vapor-solid interfaces on a flat plane or in a tube.

By 'accurately', I meant a method which was reliable and not some kind of homemade method which I have seen some papers use. I am only interested in the static contact angle as I understand that measuring dynamic contact angles can be difficult. I also understand that the more you zoom on an image the contact angle will change. Basically, I was hoping that there existed some method which is used to measure the angle and it was a method which could be consistently repeatable.

The tube is cylindrical. I understand the issues of optical measurements but this is what I am leaning towards. We don't really have the equipment to measure contact angle of even one liquid in a tube (there are published methods for this liquid-vapor-solid interface).

I see. You are correct that the apparent contact angle will vary with 'magnification', that is the essence of Dussan's series of papers. One approach is to place the two fluids in a square/rectangular cuvette (with flat windows for sides), and immerse/withdraw a solid glass rod; this 'inside-out' version obviates many of the imaging difficulties.

Adamson's Physical Chemistry of Surfaces lists a variety of measurement methods. Papers by Slattery, Dussan, and Scriven are another good source of ideas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
37K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K