Proving Strictly Increasing Derivative with Continuous Function at a Point

Click For Summary
To show that a differentiable function f is strictly increasing in a neighborhood of a point c where f'(c) > 0 and f' is continuous, one can utilize the definition of continuity. By selecting epsilon as f'(c)/2, it can be demonstrated that f'(x) remains positive in the interval (c-epsilon, c+epsilon). This leads to the conclusion that for any x < y within this interval, f(x) < f(y), confirming that f is strictly increasing. The key is linking the continuity of the derivative to the positivity of f' in the neighborhood around c. This approach effectively establishes the desired result.
H2Pendragon
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose f is differentiable on J, c is in J0 and f'(c) > 0. Show that if f' is continuous at c, then f is strictly increasing on some neighborhood of c


Homework Equations


Strictly increasing: If x < y then f(x) < f(y)
Continuous: For all epsilon > 0 there exists a delta > 0 such that x in D union B(a;delta) implies that |f(x) - f(a)| < epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have any attempts to write down here. I'm mainly looking for a push in the right direction. I've been staring at the definitions and just can't see the easiest way to link them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
H2Pendragon said:

Homework Statement


Suppose f is differentiable on J, c is in J0 and f'(c) > 0. Show that if f' is continuous at c, then f is strictly increasing on some neighborhood of c


Homework Equations


Strictly increasing: If x < y then f(x) < f(y)
Continuous: For all epsilon > 0 there exists a delta > 0 such that x in D union B(a;delta) implies that |f(x) - f(a)| < epsilon
Yes, and now take a= c and epsilon= f(c)/2 to show that f'(x)> 0 in (c-epsilon, c+epsilon).

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have any attempts to write down here. I'm mainly looking for a push in the right direction. I've been staring at the definitions and just can't see the easiest way to link them.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, and now take a= c and epsilon= f(c)/2 to show that f'(x)> 0 in (c-epsilon, c+epsilon).

Thanks for the reply. How does taking epsilon = f(c)/2 get me that f'(x) > 0?

I plugged it in and I end up getting that f'(c) - f(c)/2 < f(x) < f'(c) + f(c)/2

I understand, though, that finding f'(x) > 0 solves it. I'm just curious about this middle step. I assume I have to show that f'(c) = f(c)/2 ??
 
Did you mean to let epsilon = f'(c)/2?

Because that would solve it.

It would then be that f'(c) - f'(c)/2 < f'(x) => f(c)/2 < f'(x). Which means that f'(x) is strictly greater than 0. Thus f(x) is strictly increasing.

Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K