Continuous, Onto Function: (0,1)x(0,1)->R^2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenge of finding a continuous onto function from the open unit square (0,1)x(0,1) to R^2. It is established that such a function must approach infinity at the edges of the square, as a continuous bijection between the compact space [0,1]x[0,1] and the Hausdorff space R^2 cannot exist due to their differing topological properties. The proposed method of combining two bijections, f and g, from (0,1) to R^2 does not yield a valid solution in general cases. The specific function suggested for consideration is f(z) = (tan(π(x-1/2)), i(tan(π(y-1/2))) with x as the real part and y as the imaginary part of z.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions in topology
  • Knowledge of bijections and homeomorphisms
  • Familiarity with the properties of compact and Hausdorff spaces
  • Basic complex analysis, particularly with functions of a complex variable
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of continuous functions in topology
  • Study the implications of compactness and Hausdorff spaces in topology
  • Explore the concept of homeomorphisms and their significance in topology
  • Investigate the behavior of complex functions, particularly in relation to mappings in R^2
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and complex analysis, as well as students seeking to understand the intricacies of continuous functions and their mappings in higher dimensions.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Continuous, Onto Function: (0,1)x(0,1)-->R^2

Hi, All:

Just curious about finding a continuous onto function from the open unit square (0,1)x(0,1)
into R^2. All I can think is that the function must go to infinity towards the edges, because
if it could be continued into the whole square, so that we would get a continuous bijection between compact [0,1]x[0,1] and Hausdorff R^2, which would then necessarily be a homeomorphism, which cannot happen for many reasons (e.g., square has boundary, R^2 does not; square has a cutset of two points and R^2 does not).

It seems at first that pairing up two bijections f,g:(0,1)-->R^2 into h=fxg would work, but it does not, I don't think; the technique does not work in the general case, e.g., f(x)=x and g(x)=2x, both from R-->R.

Any Ideas?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


[URL]http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?f(z)=%5Cleft%20(%5Ctan%5Cleft%20%5Cpi%20(x-%5Cfrac{1}{2})%20%5Cright%20%5Cright%20)%20+%5Cmathbf{i}%5Cleft%20(%5Ctan%5Cleft%20%5Cpi%20(y-%5Cfrac{1}{2})%20%5Cright%20%5Cright%20)[/URL]
where x=Re{z} and y=Im{z}.
Does it work?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K