Continuum Mechanics or Design/Manufacturing?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a master's degree in continuum mechanics versus design/manufacturing. Participants emphasize that design/manufacturing offers greater job security and aligns more closely with industry needs for trained problem solvers who can deliver solutions within budget and time constraints. The consensus leans towards design/manufacturing as the more practical choice for those aiming to work in the industry, despite the inherent interest in physics and continuum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of engineering principles
  • Familiarity with design and manufacturing processes
  • Knowledge of problem-solving techniques in engineering contexts
  • Awareness of industry job market trends
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the curriculum for master's programs in design/manufacturing
  • Explore career opportunities in engineering design roles
  • Learn about project management techniques relevant to engineering
  • Investigate the role of physics in engineering applications
USEFUL FOR

Students considering a master's degree in engineering, professionals in the engineering field, and anyone interested in understanding the practical applications of design and manufacturing in industry.

Sho Kano
Messages
372
Reaction score
3
Hi, people of PF
I'm trying to decide between concentrating on continuum mechanics or design/manufacturing for my master's degree. My goal is to ultimately work in the industry, so design/manufacturing seems to make a lot of sense. However at the same time, continuum mechanics (and physics in general) is really interesting, but doesn't seem as fit for jobs as the other option. I'm torn between these two, and would love some input!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never taken any engineering courses, but it sounds like design/manufacturing would have more job security. While physics is fun, you have your entire life to learn it.
 
Summarizing many words into a couple of concise statements:

Industry has problems to solve which are tied to schedules and revenue. Industry needs to hire trained problem solvers who can attack a problem effectively and produce an acceptable solution. The solution must fit within schedule and budget constraints because neither of those is infinite. Engineers are trained to be problem solvers. Engineers get the experience over time to discern what is an "acceptable solution" incorporating technical compromises that fits within over-committed schedules and insufficient budgets.

Science by its nature is something else I think.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sho Kano and Ben Espen
pat8126 said:
I've never taken any engineering courses, but it sounds like design/manufacturing would have more job security. While physics is fun, you have your entire life to learn it.
Yep I've decided on Design. I reached the same conclusion :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
755
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K