Integrating a Photon Gas: Contour Integration for the Grand Potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of the grand potential for a photon gas, specifically the integral Σ = a∫₀^∞ x²ln(1 - e^{-bx})dx. The user seeks guidance on applying contour integration to evaluate this integral, which they recognize can be transformed into a more familiar form related to Stefan's Law. The contour method described involves an imaginary contour in the complex plane that avoids the singularity at x=0, leading to the conclusion that the integral evaluates to the residue at this point. Further insights suggest differentiating the original equations with respect to b for additional clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of contour integration techniques in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with the residue theorem in complex analysis
  • Knowledge of Stefan's Law and its mathematical implications
  • Basic principles of analytic functions and singularities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the residue theorem in complex analysis
  • Learn about contour integration methods in more detail
  • Explore the relationship between photon gases and thermodynamic potentials
  • Investigate differentiation techniques in integral calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, as well as mathematicians interested in complex analysis and contour integration techniques.

Parmenides
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
When considering the grand potential for a photon gas, one encounters an integral of the form:
\Sigma = a\int_{0}^{\infty}x^2\ln\Big(1 - e^{-bx}\Big)dx
I have never had to integrate something like this before; I was told it is done via contour integration, but I have never used such a method and the examples typically given are not of this form. Could somebody please provide some assistance? I have tried to learn a bit myself, but I remain perplexed. What would be the contour enclosing such an integral, for example? Thanks.

UPDATE: I noticed that integration by parts puts the integral in a form of \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{x^3dx}{e^{bx} - 1} ignoring constants. I now recognize this as a familiar integral found in Stefan's Law, but it would still be nice to see someone's perspective of the contour method to evaluate it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looking at your updated integral, this is an analytic function away from the singularity (simple pole) at x=0. The contour method would have you draw an imaginary contour in the RE, IM plane which traces the imaginary axis from +infty to +epsilon*i then makes a small half circle cut to +epsilon and follows the real axis to +infty, then has a semicircular closure with radius +infty. This contour excludes the singularity at 0, so clearly is analytic on the interior of the contour, which means it will be zero.

Therefore, the evaluation of your integral simplifies to the evaluation of the residue at x=zero.
See the wikipedia pages for more thorough explanation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_(complex_analysis )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that differentiating your original equations with respect to b on both sides might help.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K