Contour integral representation of Kronecker delta

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the contour integral representation of the Kronecker delta function, specifically the expression $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint z^{m-n-1} dz$. The analysis confirms that for $m \neq n$, the integral evaluates to zero, while for $m = n$, it results in $2\pi i$. The correct contour for integration is established as the circle $|z| = r$. This leads to the conclusion that $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint z^{m-n-1} dz = \delta_{m,n}$, clarifying the conditions under which the Kronecker delta is defined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Contour integration techniques
  • Understanding of the Kronecker delta function
  • Parametrization of complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of contour integrals in complex analysis
  • Explore the implications of the residue theorem
  • Learn about the applications of the Kronecker delta in mathematical physics
  • Investigate different parametrizations for contour integration
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focused on complex analysis, theoretical physics, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical functions like the Kronecker delta.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
I'm rather impressed with complex analysis, but clearly I have a lot to learn.

I'm told $ \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint {z}^{m-n-1} dz $ is a rep. of the kronecker delta function, so I tried to work through that. I used $z = re^{i\theta}$ and got to $ \frac{1}{2\pi} [\frac{{r}^{m-n}}{i(m-n)}e^{i\theta(m-n)} ]^{2\pi}_0 $

I have since found this on the web, so it seems right - all I need do is evaluate it for m=n and m \NE n ...but I'm stuck. Is there one of those nice tricks to use as the next step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More care is needed in your analysis. You need a specified contour in order to perform contour integration. Also, if $m = n$, the expression $\frac{1}{m - n}$ is undefined. Based of your choice of parametrization, I assume that the contour of integration is the circle $|z| = r$. If $m\neq n$, then your calculations are so far correct (again, assuming that the contour is the circle $|z| = r$), and the result is zero (since $e^{i2\pi(m - n)} - e^{i0(m-n)} = 1 - 1 = 0$). If $m = n$, then $$\oint z^{m-n-1}\, dz = \oint z^{-1} dz = \int_0^{2\pi} (re^{i\theta})^{-1}\cdot ire^{i\theta}\, d\theta = \int_0^{2\pi} i\, d\theta = 2\pi i.$$

Hence $\oint z^{m-n-1}\, dz = 2\pi i\delta_{m,n}$, or

$$\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint z^{m-n-1}\, dz = \delta_{m,n}.$$
 
Sorry, yes that's the contour (I thought a small circle around 0 was a default contour).

I somehow missed both of those, they are straight forward (I might have been a little tired (Doh)) - thanks as usual for the clarity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
976
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K